Should Argentina continue to participate in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?
The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement that was created to lower trade restrictions between Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions); and 2) consumer and environmental protections.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (i.e. better or adequate wages and working conditions); and 2) consumer and environmental protections.
@8YPV9GG3yrs3Y
NAFTA should be reworked, but the underlying principle is important.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should also add provisions that better protect labor (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and used only to benefit consumers instead of multinational corporations. It should be applied on every free trade agreements.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, with more environmental and workers protection.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should also add provisions that better protect labor (for better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and used only to benefit consumers instead of multinational corporations. It should be applied on every free trade agreements.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor rights (for better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but with better workers and environmental protection.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor (i.e. more wages and better working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor rights (for adequate wages and better working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.
@8ZSR5NL3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should add more provisions that promote better protections for workers (i.e. better, more adequate wages and working conditions), consumers, and the environment; and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be enacted on each trade agreements.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Trade between member countries have become too imbalance, abolish NAFTA
@6HDD83R4yrs4Y
NAFTA should include the countries that are geographically part of North America (except Cuba, which should be excluded for as long as they are a communist country)
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but increase workers and environmental rights.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, and the Federal Government should expand NAFTA
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but with more environmental and workers rights.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, with an emphasis on workers and environmental protection.
Deleted4yrs4Y
yes, but with an emphasis on workers and environmental protection.
Deleted4yrs4Y
With better environmental and workers rights.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, with better workers and environmental protection
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but with better workers and environmental protections.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but there needs to be better workers and environmental protection in place.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, with better workers and environmental protections.
Deleted4yrs4Y
Yes, but with more workers and environmental protection.
Deleted3yrs3Y
More workers and environmental rights.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but only with more workers and environmental protections.
Deleted3yrs3Y
There needs to be more workers and environmental protections.
@4RGMTSD3yrs3Y
Yes, but renegotiate to even the playing field.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but with more workers and environmental protections.
@3MTJDYD4yrs4Y
Yes as long as all countries collectively agree on a minimum wage.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Better workers and environmental protections.
Deleted3yrs3Y
More protection for workers and the environment.
Deleted4yrs4Y
There needs to be better workers and environmental rights.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (e.g. better working conditions and fair wages and benefits); 2) consumer/environmental protections; and 2) better or adequate trade of goods.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (e.g. better working conditions and fair wages); 2) consumer and environmental protections; and 3) adequate trade of goods.
@4JYTC7M4yrs4Y
No, we should engage in trade that is fair to workers
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
No, NAFTA harms working people in the United States and next to TTP is the worst trade deal in recent American history
@4W48KKZ4yrs4Y
Yes, the NAFTA not only lowers the prices of consumer products, but also improves North American relations and decreases the environmental impact of transporting goods.
@8PSZWPL4yrs4Y
Yes, and we should form an EU style Union with the countries of North America
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Yes, but I am fine with the USMCA policy.
@92YHQCV3yrs3Y
No, NAFTA has cost us nearly 700,000 American jobs. After all, free trade agreements like NAFTA, Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, and the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement have allowed too many American jobs to move overseas. Plus, Previous trade deals and the loss of manufacturing jobs have had disastrous consequences for American workers.
@8H4DF7B4yrs4Y
Yes but work on improving worker's rights and do a study on the ethics and effects and efficiency of current tax laws.
@867M8DK4yrs4Y
Yes, but we should renegotiate it to be more environmentalist and worker-friendly
@IINXMP4yrs4Y
Yes, but we should temporarily ban trade with China and create anti-Chinese tax incentives for international businesses.
@6HQ4HQ53yrs3Y
Yes, but it needs to be reformed to be more fair to the United States.
@78S5M874yrs4Y
We should start being friends with every country in the world and be peaceful to everyone.
@6RW5J4M3yrs3Y
Yes, and we should expand free trade across the world
@78Q5L5B4yrs4Y
We should still participate in NAFTA, but not allow corporations to outsource jobs
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated among the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and fair livable wages for labor
@89SH3SL4yrs4Y
NAFTA is no longer in effect
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, this agreement has resulted in an imbalance of trade among the member countries and an exportation of American manufacturing jobs in exchange for low wage labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a substitute trade agreement for NAFTA needs to be drafted and negotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, restricting the outsourcing of jobs, and a livable wage scale for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new trade agreement to replace NAFTA should be negotiated between the member countries, one that gives more consideration to balance of trade, saving jobs and livable wages for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new trade agreement should be negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and fair livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of limiting job outsourcing and guaranteeing livable wages as part of workers' rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced and jobs are being exported for low wage labor
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new trade agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of the member countries
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of these member countries
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, NAFTA or a new trade agreement needs to be renegotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, restricting the outsourcing of jobs, and a fair, livable wage scale for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, either NAFTA or a new trade agreement needs to be renegotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and a fair livable wage scale for workers
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of the member countries
@8CN7P7L4yrs4Y
No, renegotiate NAFTA so it can be fair
@8CN7P7L3yrs3Y
No, NAFTA was ripping off the United States millions of manufacturing jobs were lost because of it instead, I support the making of USMCA.
@8CN7P7L4yrs4Y
Yes, renegotiate NAFTA so it can be fair
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to ensure a greater balance of trade and restrictions on the exportation of manufacturing jobs
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure a fair trade balance, living wages for manufacturing labor, and restricting outsourcing of domestic jobs
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, the agreement has resulted in the exportation of thousands of manufacturing jobs in exchange for low-wage labor
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, the agreement has resulted in the exportation of thousands of American manufacturing jobs to other countries in exchange for low wage labor
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, this should be renegotiated and replaced with an agreement that balances trade more fairly and restricts the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure living wages and reasonable amounts of working hours for manufacturing labor, and to restrict outsourcing of domestic jobs
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure a fair trade balance, living wages and reasonable amounts of working hours for manufacturing labor, and to restrict outsourcing of domestic jobs
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and renegotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of the member countries.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but the agreement needs to be amended and renegotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of the member countries.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but the agreement needs to be amended and renegotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of the member countries
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, unless the agreement can be renegotiated to address the issues of an imbalance of trade between the member countries and living wages for workers.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, not until the agreement is renegotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each member country
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated among the member countries to address the issues of an imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and living wages for workers.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, if the agreement is renegotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade and living wages for labor
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only if the agreement is renegotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each member country
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only if the agreement is renegotiated between the participating countries to address imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but the agreement should be renegotiated between the participating countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new agreement should be negotiated between the participating countries to address imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, exportation of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only if the agreement is renegotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade and living wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new agreement should be negotiated between the participating countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new agreement should be drawn and negotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, exportation of jobs, and livable wages for labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new trade agreement needs to be drafted and negotiated between the participating countries to address imbalance of trade and outsourcing of jobs
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new trade agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated between the member countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade and the exporting of jobs for low wage labor
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, draft and negotiate a new agreement among the member countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and a livable wage as part of workers rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, draft and negotiate a new trade agreement among the member countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and a livable wage as part of workers rights
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of these member countries.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of these member countries
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
No, a new trade agreement needs to replace it addressing the issues of imbalance of trade and exporting jobs for low wage labor
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of these member countries.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of limiting job outsourcing and livable wages as part of workers' rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but re-negotiate aspects of the agreement to address the issues of outsourcing of jobs among the member countries and livable wages as part of workers rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of job outsourcing and the guarantee of livable wages as part of workers' rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but re-negotiate aspects of the agreement to address the issues of imbalance of trade among the member countries and a livable wage as part of worker rights
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but re-negotiate aspects of the agreement to address the issues of imbalance of trade among the member countries and a livable wage as part of workers' rights
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
No, a new agreement needs to be drawn up and negotiated to address issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of worker rights in each of these member countries
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
