Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
@MuxxerLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, but it should be replaced with nuclear power as soon as possible
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but only to extract natural gas with increased oversight
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@8RJFWXB4yrs4Y
No, we should use our resources to research sources of energy such as fusion
@8FDNNMS4yrs4Y
yes, until we can use more sustainable energy resources
@8D9HP694yrs4Y
Yes, natural gas is much better for both the economy and the environment than coal and oil.
@8HW56ZF4yrs4Y
No because doing that it makes it unnatural
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but increase oversight to avoid oil spills, and find a way to continue the process in such a way where it possess no threat to the environment.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but increase regulations and oversight, and provide more scientific research to measure the effects it has, short and long-term, on us and to the environment. However, if it keeps getting worse, then phase it out and move towards better energy sources, such as nuclear and renewable energy.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but more oversight and rigorous following of safety procedures is needed to prevent and manage the risk of accidents that could cause harm, since fracking leads to environmental or health issues. There should be more research to measure the effects it has on the environment, and on human health.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherences to safety procedures to prevent accidents that could cause harm, since fracking leads to environmental or health issues. There should be more research to measure the effects it has on the environment, and on human health.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherences to safety procedures to prevent and manage accidents, since fracking leads to environmental or health issues. There should be more research to measure the long-term effects it has on the environment, and on human health.
@8QKJ7R94yrs4Y
No, fracking uses fabric softener and other chemicals harmful to the wildlife
@4SKVPWD4yrs4Y
Yes, but the industry needs to find safety ways to use this technology.
@8QG5XSM4yrs4Y
as long as they are held 100% reliable for anything that happens
@3B3DJJL4yrs4Y
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources, especially nuclear
@8RBQDDP4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as it is done in safe ways that does not harm the environment
@8HXVBHG4yrs4Y
i dont anything about this topic
@8QQ5NLZ3yrs3Y
No, research has concluded that fracking is harmful to the population and environment
@8SF6R494yrs4Y
I do not think fossil fuels are good, but so many people have jobs in fossil fuels.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
In the short term, but begin to slowly transition to cleaner alternatives.
@8PK69PX4yrs4Y
Companies should be able to decide what path is best for them and the government should not be involved at all.
@8HJP9WN4yrs4Y
No, we know enough about its effects on climate and our environment that it shouldn't be allowed.
@8SMKCCQ4yrs4Y
It has a place in our world whether we like it or not, it's too big to fail
@8KX67Q94yrs4Y
Yes, but not new permissions on federal land and we should incentivize alternate energy resources.
@6PJZCMJ4yrs4Y
No, but it should not be banned.
@DsInferno4yrs4Y
For the moment yes but, phase it out in favor of sustainable energy sources
@6LV5ZML3yrs3Y
Yes, but only in areas where it is deemed low-risk to the population and environment.
@7NHW7HN3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should still pursue safer ways of resourcing
@75KRFBJ4yrs4Y
Yes, while we transition into other sustainable energy resources
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only with increased oversight and not in heavily populated areas
@86LT58K4yrs4Y
Yes, but apply appropriate oversight, no subsidies, and mandate cost of energy = cost to produce energy + cost to environment/cleanup .
@86NBM3N4yrs4Y
Yes, but phase-out of it in the coming years
@89CY6474yrs4Y
There should be no laws related specifically to fracking.
@8CNT65N4yrs4Y
Only in unpopulated and safe areas
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas and continue to pursue more sustainable energy resources.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas and oversight should be increased.
@8F3TJ7L4yrs4Y
For now, but we need to be incentivizing alternate methods.
@8FG75SF4yrs4Y
Yes, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead, but so long as oversight is increased it is a practical way to produce energy.
@8FWZTTK4yrs4Y
No, but not governments responsibility
@8HJ6ZY74yrs4Y
Not in the long run but temporarily until we can get more nuclear and renewable generation facilities reliably online without intermittency in the case of renewables
@8HKVTKT4yrs4Y
I need mor information about this topic
@8HQTH284yrs4Y
Yes, but only when alternative resources are not available.
@8JXC6F84yrs4Y
only if it doesent hurt the enviorment
@8JZHKVX4yrs4Y
While this process currently has a merit to society, I believe we should take measures to distance ourselves from the process at large. An emphasis on renewables and nuclear energy should be society's goal going forward.
@8QM9QMR4yrs4Y
i do not have enough information to conduct a stance.
@8MF2Z5Q4yrs4Y
Yes but there should be less of it.
@8NXSCW24yrs4Y
Yes, with the condition that we are actively moving towards renewable energy.
@8PD23XN3yrs3Y
Yes, but increase oversight and use it only when absolutely necessary, we need to get closer to being 100% green energy.
@8PMF46F4yrs4Y
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources and conduct research to measure the long-term effects of domestic fracking
@8PJHVJN4yrs4Y
Yes, drill, baby drill and nationalize this industry.
@TogetherinSoli14yrs4Y
No, the importance of fossil fuels in today's society should be recognised, but we should move towards more sustainable energy
@8R8DHKJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but only until we adapt a more sustainable source of energy
@8RPZ3MP4yrs4Y
Yes, but we should invest in more environmentally friendly energy sources such as nuclear energy instead
@8S23F2Z4yrs4Y
do not know enough on the topic
@8SJW8494yrs4Y
Yes, but implement a tax on fracking.
@8TFWF2Z3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should pursue more sustainable energy resources with a goal of eventually transitioning away from this practice
@WolferusYT3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should be working towards cleaner energy resources in order to eventually eliminate the need for it.
@8WWSZZX3yrs3Y
Yes, until we can find other renewable resources.
@8XWRJ7H3yrs3Y
Yes, but regulations and oversight should be put in place to make sure that the environment and wildlife are not harmed.
@93CS3TH3yrs3Y
Yes. Fracking is a better alternative to coal
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but increase regulation and oversight, and provide more scientific research to measure the effects it has, short and long-term, on us and to the environment. However, if the problem keeps getting worse, then phase it out and move towards better energy sources, such as nuclear and renewable energy.
@93G2RP73yrs3Y
Yes, as long as it doesn't damage the environment or water supplies
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.