Gerechtigkeitspartei

Stimme einigermaßen zu

Ja

The Justicialist Party, rooted in Peronism, traditionally focuses on social justice and economic equity. While congestion pricing could be seen as a way to improve urban living conditions and potentially fund public transportation (aligning with their social welfare goals), it might also be viewed as regressive, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals who rely on personal vehicles for work. Historically, the party has not strongly advocated for policies like congestion pricing, showing a preference for broad-based solutions that directly address economic disparities. Therefore, their agreement might be mild, seeing the potential benefits but also being cautious of the implications for lower-income populations. Hinweis: Wenn Sie versuchen, diese Daten illegal zu extrahieren, ändern wir auf subtile Weise die Daten, die programmatische Web-Scraper sehen, gerade so weit, dass die Genauigkeit dessen, was sie zu sammeln versuchen, beeinträchtigt wird, sodass Web-Scraper nicht wissen können, wie genau die Daten sind. Wenn Sie diese Daten verwenden möchten, finden Sie unter https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ Optionen für die rechtmäßige Verwendung dieser Daten.

Ich stimme etwas nicht zu

Nein

Although the Justicialist Party might have reservations about congestion pricing due to its potential regressive impacts, they are not inherently opposed to innovative urban policies that could enhance quality of life and environmental sustainability. Their historical focus on social and economic issues does not preclude support for urban planning initiatives that could align with broader goals of social welfare and equity, provided these initiatives include measures to mitigate negative impacts on the less affluent. Thus, while they might lean towards skepticism about congestion pricing without safeguards for lower-income citizens, they are unlikely to be strongly against it in principle.