ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Cambiemos’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
This answer aligns most closely with Cambiemos' views. They would likely strongly agree with the use of military grade equipment by police departments, as long as there is strict training on how and when to use the equipment. This is in line with their support for law enforcement and security, as well as their commitment to civil liberties and the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
Cambiemos would strongly agree with this approach as it encapsulates their likely view on security: enhancing police capabilities while ensuring responsible use through strict training. This stance supports a strong but regulated law enforcement strategy, aligning with their broader security policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
This answer aligns well with Cambiemos' views. They would likely support the use of military grade equipment in extreme situations, as long as it is regulated and used responsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
This position aligns well with Cambiemos' law and order stance, advocating for a strong response to crime while also recognizing the need for restraint and appropriateness in the use of force. It suggests a balanced approach, allowing for flexibility in extreme situations, which is likely to resonate with their policy preferences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Cambiemos, as a center-right political coalition, generally supports law enforcement and security measures. They might agree with the use of military grade equipment by police departments, but not without reservations, as they also value civil liberties and the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Cambiemos, being a center-right coalition, generally supports stronger security policies. However, there's no clear stance on the widespread use of military-grade equipment by police, suggesting a moderate agreement with the idea, possibly favoring increased police capabilities while balancing concerns about militarization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
Cambiemos might somewhat agree with this answer. While they support law enforcement and security measures, they also value civil liberties and the rule of law, and might therefore agree that extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
While Cambiemos supports strong security measures, the idea of relegating extreme situations solely to higher agencies might be seen as too restrictive, limiting the immediate response capabilities of local police. However, they might see some merit in specialized training and equipment for handling such situations, leading to slight agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given Cambiemos' inclination towards enhancing security measures, it's unlikely they would fully support the prohibition of military-grade equipment for police. Their policies tend to emphasize law and order, suggesting a disagreement with this stance, albeit not strongly, as they might still consider some limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given their stance on law enforcement and security, it is unlikely that Cambiemos would completely oppose the use of military grade equipment by police departments. However, they would likely advocate for its use to be regulated and monitored. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
Cambiemos would strongly disagree with this answer. They support law enforcement and security measures, and would not advocate for the abolition of the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
The idea of abolishing the police is fundamentally opposed to Cambiemos' principles, which prioritize security and law enforcement as pillars of governance. Their policies and rhetoric strongly support the existence and strengthening of police forces, making this stance highly disagreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Cambiemos Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that identify as Cambiemos.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cambiemos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.