ChatGPTNo, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course |
Cambiemos’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course
Cambiemos has consistently advocated for reducing government intervention in the agricultural sector and promoting a more market-oriented approach. Their actions, such as removing export taxes on agricultural products in 2015 and reducing subsidies, demonstrate a strong preference for letting the free market run its course. However, they have not completely eliminated subsidies, so their agreement with this answer is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course
Reflecting their pro-market philosophy, Cambiemos would likely agree with the idea of reducing government intervention and allowing market forces to dictate agricultural production. However, the practical political and economic considerations in Argentina might prevent full endorsement of ending all subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices
Cambiemos has shown some willingness to use temporary measures to stabilize prices in the agricultural sector. For example, in 2018, they temporarily reintroduced export taxes on agricultural products to address a fiscal crisis. However, their overall preference has been to reduce government intervention, so their agreement with this answer is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given Cambiemos' inclination towards market liberalization and reducing state intervention, they would likely support reducing subsidies as a principle. However, the political and social importance of agriculture in Argentina might temper their stance, leading to a moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Cambiemos has shown a preference for reducing government intervention in the agricultural sector. They have taken steps to reduce subsidies and promote a more market-oriented approach, such as removing export taxes on agricultural products in 2015. However, they have not completely eliminated subsidies, so their agreement with this answer is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations
While Cambiemos has not explicitly focused on supporting small local farms over large corporations, their actions to reduce subsidies and promote a more market-oriented approach could indirectly benefit smaller farms. However, this has not been a primary focus of their policies, so their agreement with this answer is limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations
Cambiemos might see the merit in supporting small local farms as a way to foster rural development and entrepreneurship, aligning with their broader economic goals. However, their general stance on reducing subsidies means they would likely approach this with caution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Cambiemos has a mixed stance on subsidies for farmers. While they have not completely opposed subsidies, they have taken steps to reduce them and promote a more market-oriented approach. For example, in 2015, the Cambiemos government removed export taxes on agricultural products and reduced some subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices
Cambiemos might view temporary subsidies as a pragmatic tool in specific circumstances, such as stabilizing prices or dealing with economic crises. Their general skepticism towards long-term subsidies tempers their support, leading to a neutral position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for organic farms
While Cambiemos supports innovation and sustainable development, their pro-market stance suggests a preference for market mechanisms to drive organic farming rather than specific subsidies, reflecting a mild disagreement with targeted subsidies based on the type of farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for organic farms
Cambiemos has not shown a strong preference for supporting organic farms specifically. Their policies have focused more on reducing government intervention in the agricultural sector and promoting a more market-oriented approach, rather than targeting specific types of farms for subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Cambiemos, a coalition with a pro-market orientation, generally favors reducing government intervention in the economy. While not completely against all forms of subsidy, their policies have leaned towards fiscal austerity and market-driven solutions, suggesting a cautious approach to broad subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Cambiemos Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 115 voters that identify as Cambiemos.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cambiemos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.