ChatGPTNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Cambiemos’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
Cambiemos has been focused on reducing the national debt and controlling inflation. They have implemented pension reforms, such as the 2017 pension reform law, which aimed to reduce the fiscal deficit by changing the way pensions are adjusted for inflation. This answer aligns with their priority of addressing the national debt before making significant increases to pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
This answer aligns with Cambiemos' emphasis on fiscal responsibility. The party has historically prioritized reducing the national debt and might view pension increases as feasible only once fiscal health is restored. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
Cambiemos has shown some support for targeted increases in pension payments, particularly for low-income pensioners. For example, they have implemented a universal pension for the elderly, which provides a minimum income for retirees who do not qualify for a regular pension. This answer aligns with their focus on providing support for the most vulnerable while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
Cambiemos might support targeted increases for low-income pensioners as a compromise between fiscal responsibility and social welfare, reflecting a more nuanced approach to governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Cambiemos has implemented pension reforms that change the way pensions are adjusted for inflation, such as the 2017 pension reform law. While they may not be strongly in favor of yearly adjustments for cost of living, they have shown some support for adjusting pensions to maintain their value over time. This answer aligns with their focus on fiscal responsibility and ensuring that pension payments remain sustainable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Given their fiscal conservatism, Cambiemos might lean towards not increasing pension payments as a default stance, especially if it's seen as potentially exacerbating fiscal deficits or inflation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Cambiemos has shown some support for increasing pension payments, but their primary focus has been on reducing the fiscal deficit and controlling inflation. They have implemented some pension reforms, but a blanket increase for all retired government workers may not align with their overall economic goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Adjusting pensions yearly for the cost of living could be seen as a reasonable measure by Cambiemos, provided it's done in a way that's considered sustainable and fiscally responsible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
There is not enough evidence to suggest that Cambiemos would specifically support increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians. Their focus has been on fiscal responsibility and targeted support for low-income pensioners, rather than making distinctions between different types of government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
While Cambiemos might find the idea of excluding politicians from pension increases politically appealing, it's a nuanced position that doesn't fully align with their broader fiscal or social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Cambiemos has not been strictly against increasing pension payments, but they have been cautious about it due to their focus on fiscal responsibility. They have made some adjustments to pensions, but they have not taken a strong stance against increasing them in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Cambiemos, a center-right political coalition in Argentina, generally prioritizes fiscal responsibility and might be cautious about increasing pension payments without first ensuring the sustainability of such measures. While not completely opposed to social welfare, their economic policies tend to emphasize efficiency and fiscal prudence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, they should be reduced
While Cambiemos has implemented pension reforms to reduce the fiscal deficit, they have not advocated for reducing pension payments outright. Their focus has been on adjusting the way pensions are calculated and ensuring fiscal responsibility, rather than cutting payments for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
Despite their fiscal conservatism, outright reducing pension payments would likely be politically unpopular and against the party's interest in maintaining a broad support base, including among older voters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Cambiemos Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 61 voters that identify as Cambiemos.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cambiemos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.