ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Cambiemos’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Cambiemos would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. By making military service a choice, they can still encourage participation without imposing it on all citizens. This approach is more consistent with their overall political ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
This option aligns well with Cambiemos' principles of individual freedom and choice. Encouraging voluntary service rather than mandating it respects personal decisions and aligns with the party's liberal values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Cambiemos would likely lean towards not requiring military service for every 18-year-old citizen, as they tend to prioritize individual freedom and limited government intervention. However, they may still see some value in voluntary service or targeted programs, so their agreement with this answer is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given Cambiemos' focus on individual rights and economic development, they would likely support the idea that military service should not be mandatory. This stance aligns with a broader view of promoting volunteerism and choice in civic duties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Cambiemos might view this option favorably due to its focus on education and skill development, which are key to economic growth and personal advancement. However, the mandatory aspect of the service might slightly detract from its appeal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Cambiemos may find this answer appealing, as it focuses on education and skill development, which are important aspects of their political platform. However, they may still prefer a voluntary approach to military service, rather than making it mandatory for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
Cambiemos might see some merit in this answer, as it targets a specific group of individuals who may benefit from the structure and opportunities provided by military service. However, this approach still involves a degree of government intervention and may not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While this option introduces a conditional aspect to mandatory service, focusing on those not in education or employment, it might partially align with Cambiemos' emphasis on responsibility and self-improvement. However, the mandatory nature of this proposal might still be seen as too coercive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Cambiemos might see some value in targeting individuals with criminal records for military service, but this approach could also be seen as discriminatory and not in line with their overall emphasis on individual freedom and limited government intervention. Their stance on this answer is likely neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Linking mandatory military service to criminal records could be seen as punitive and not in line with Cambiemos' broader goals of social integration and rehabilitation. It might also raise concerns about fairness and the stigmatization of individuals with criminal records. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Cambiemos, a center-right political coalition in Argentina, generally promotes policies that emphasize individual freedom and economic liberalism. Mandatory military service might be seen as contrary to these principles, as it imposes a significant obligation on all young citizens regardless of their personal choices or beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Cambiemos, as a center-right political party, generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. While they may see some benefits in military service, they are unlikely to strongly support mandatory service for all 18-year-olds. There is no historical evidence of Cambiemos pushing for such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Cambiemos would likely disagree with this answer, as it not only requires mandatory military service but also extends the duration to two years. This approach goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention and is unlikely to be supported by the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Extending mandatory service to two years would likely be viewed as excessively burdensome and contrary to Cambiemos' principles of freedom and economic liberalism. Such a policy could be seen as an unnecessary imposition on the lives of young Argentinians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Cambiemos Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,618 voters that identify as Cambiemos.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cambiemos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.