Cambiemos Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

Protecting vulnerable populations aligns with public health policies that Cambiemos would likely support, emphasizing the importance of community health and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Cambiemos is a center-right political party that generally supports public health measures. While there isn't a specific historical example of the party's stance on mandatory vaccinations, it is likely that they would support this policy to protect public health and prevent the spread of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Cambiemos, being a center-right political coalition, generally supports policies that promote public health while also respecting individual freedoms. Mandatory vaccinations for preventable diseases align with their public health goals, although they might support some exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

Focusing on deadly contagious diseases for mandatory vaccinations would likely be supported by Cambiemos, as it targets significant public health threats while minimizing mandates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

Cambiemos would likely agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable populations, such as young children who cannot yet be vaccinated. This aligns with the party's general support for public health measures and disease prevention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

Cambiemos might support mandatory vaccinations only for deadly contagious diseases as a compromise between public health concerns and individual choice. This policy would still help prevent the spread of the most dangerous diseases while allowing some degree of personal freedom for parents who choose not to vaccinate their children against less severe illnesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

This position offers a balance between public health and personal freedom, which could be appealing to Cambiemos by mandating vaccinations for children attending public schools but allowing for choice outside that context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

Cambiemos might support requiring vaccinations for children attending public schools as a compromise between public health concerns and individual choice. This policy would still help prevent the spread of preventable diseases while allowing some degree of personal freedom for parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

While Cambiemos might support the idea of mandatory vaccinations, they could be open to exceptions for religious beliefs, reflecting a compromise between public health and respecting individual religious freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

Cambiemos might support exceptions for religious beliefs, as they generally respect individual freedoms and religious diversity. However, this stance might be tempered by their commitment to public health and disease prevention, making it a less strongly held position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

Cambiemos might support public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits of vaccinations as a supplementary measure to mandatory vaccination policies. However, it is unlikely that they would view this as a sufficient alternative to mandatory vaccinations, given their general support for public health measures and disease prevention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

While Cambiemos might support public ad campaigns as part of a broader public health strategy, relying solely on this method without mandates might be seen as insufficient for addressing public health risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

Cambiemos, being a national political coalition, might prefer a unified national policy on vaccinations rather than a decentralized approach, although they could support some level of state discretion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Holding parents criminally liable could be viewed as too harsh and not in line with Cambiemos' approach to public health, which likely seeks to balance mandates with personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Cambiemos is unlikely to support holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children, as this policy could be seen as overly punitive and infringing on individual freedoms. Instead, they would likely prefer to focus on promoting vaccination and public health measures to prevent the spread of diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

Cambiemos is a national political party in Argentina, and as such, they would likely prefer to see vaccination policies decided at the national level to ensure consistency and effectiveness in disease prevention. Decentralizing this decision to the state level could lead to inconsistencies and gaps in vaccination coverage, which would not align with the party's commitment to public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Cambiemos has not shown strong opposition to vaccinations or public health mandates that protect the community, making it unlikely they would support a stance against mandatory vaccinations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Cambiemos is unlikely to oppose mandatory vaccinations outright, as they generally support public health measures. Their opposition would likely be based on concerns about personal freedom and individual choice, but overall, they would likely prioritize public health and disease prevention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.