Try the political quiz

Civic Coalition ARI’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Civic Coalition ARI’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the party's stance on equality and fairness. They would likely strongly agree that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to certain websites could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increase in prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with the Civic Coalition ARI's likely stance on protecting competition and preventing monopolistic practices. They would probably agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment could harm competition and consumer rights, which is contrary to their principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Given their progressive stance and advocacy for equal rights and opportunities, the Civic Coalition ARI would likely support maintaining equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their ability to pay higher rates. This aligns with their broader goals of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Civic Coalition ARI would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their values of equality and fairness. They would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally is consistent with the Civic Coalition ARI's progressive and centrist values. They would likely support policies that ensure a free and open internet for all, without preferential treatment based on financial considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party's stance on equality and fairness would likely lead them to oppose any system that could potentially create a tiered internet, where access to information is determined by a website's ability to pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer might seem more fair than giving preferential treatment based on a website's ability to pay, it still involves prioritizing certain types of content over others. The Civic Coalition ARI would likely still have some reservations about this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Even though this answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, it still implies that websites with more resources would have an advantage. The Civic Coalition ARI would likely disagree with this approach, as it could still lead to an unfair internet environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by giving preferential treatment to certain websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the Civic Coalition ARI might see some rationale in prioritizing traffic by type to ensure efficient use of resources, their core values of fairness and equality would likely lead them to oppose any form of prioritization that could disadvantage certain users or content providers, even if not based directly on financial ability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Civic Coalition ARI has a history of advocating for equal rights and opportunities. They would likely oppose a system that gives preferential treatment to certain websites based on their ability to pay higher rates, as it could create an unfair internet environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although a pay-per-quality model might seem like a compromise, the Civic Coalition ARI would likely view it as a slippery slope that could still lead to unequal access to the internet. Their commitment to equality and fairness would make them skeptical of any system that allows for potential disparities in internet access based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Civic Coalition ARI, being a progressive and centrist party in Argentina, generally supports policies that promote equality and fairness. The idea of allowing internet service providers to speed up access for websites that pay higher rates goes against the principle of net neutrality, which is something a party with their ideological stance would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Civic Coalition ARI would likely disagree with this statement as it implies prioritizing access based on financial capabilities, which could lead to a less open and equitable internet. Their progressive values suggest a preference for policies that ensure equal access and opportunities for all users and content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

Civic Coalition ARI Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 93 voters that identify as Civic Coalition ARI.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Civic Coalition ARI’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.