Federal Peronism Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns closely with the principles of Federal Peronism. They would likely agree strongly with the idea that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with Federal Peronism's advocacy for competition and against monopolistic practices. It emphasizes the importance of preventing market manipulation, which is consistent with the party's broader economic and social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally resonates with Federal Peronism's principles of fairness and equal access to services, making this stance highly agreeable to the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Federal Peronism would likely strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with their principles of equality and fairness, and their belief in the importance of maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Federal Peronism would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their principles of equality and fairness. They would likely see this as a way to ensure that all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources, have equal access to users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given its historical emphasis on social equity and inclusion, Federal Peronism would likely support maintaining equal access to the internet for all, viewing it as a public service that should be accessible to everyone regardless of their ability to pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer might seem more fair than simply speeding up access to popular websites, it still involves prioritizing certain types of content over others. Federal Peronism would likely see this as a form of inequality and would therefore disagree with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground, Federal Peronism might view it as insufficient in addressing the core issue of equitable access to information, as it still allows for potential prioritization based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still result in inequality as wealthier websites could afford to pay for higher quality. This would likely be seen as contrary to the principles of Federal Peronism, which advocates for equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this model suggests a form of meritocracy in service quality, Federal Peronism would likely be skeptical of its implementation, fearing it could still lead to unequal access based on financial capability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Federal Peronism might agree that making the internet faster and more reliable for users is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method proposed in this answer. They would likely see it as favoring the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the less popular or financially disadvantaged. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Federal Peronism, with its roots in social justice and equity, would likely oppose policies that could create unequal access to information, seeing them as contrary to the principles of fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a populist political movement, has traditionally advocated for policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would likely be seen as favoring the wealthy and powerful, which is contrary to the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Federal Peronism would probably disagree with this statement, as it suggests prioritizing profit over equitable access to information, which conflicts with the party's foundational principles of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.