Federal Peronism Party

Strongly agree

Yes, except for low income citizens

Federal Peronism has a strong focus on social justice and protecting the rights of low-income citizens. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with an exception for low-income citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a populist and nationalist movement, has historically supported measures that increase government oversight and regulation. However, the specific context of online payment platforms and the $600 threshold may not be directly applicable to their historical stances, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While Federal Peronism would likely support the reporting of transactions to the IRS, they may also agree with a higher threshold, especially considering the economic situation in Argentina. However, without specific historical references to this issue, the score is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

While Federal Peronism would likely support the reporting of income transactions to the IRS, they may be less supportive of reporting all transactions, especially those that are not considered income. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Federal Peronism has traditionally supported government intervention in economic affairs, which includes financial transactions. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not reporting transactions to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, private transactions should be kept private

Given Federal Peronism's historical support for government intervention and regulation, they would likely strongly disagree with the idea that private transactions should be kept private. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.