Federal Peronism, or Dissident Peronism, are the informal names given to a political alliance between Justicialist…
ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
Federal Peronism’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
Federal Peronism would likely support allowing politicians who have finished serving their sentence to run for office. This stance aligns with the party's belief in social justice and the possibility of redemption, as well as the idea that individuals should not be perpetually punished for past mistakes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
Federal Peronism may be more likely to support allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office if the crime was not committed while in office. This stance acknowledges the possibility of personal growth and rehabilitation while still maintaining a level of accountability for actions taken while serving in a public capacity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Federal Peronism, as a faction of the broader Peronist movement, has historically shown some tolerance for politicians with criminal convictions. However, this stance is not universally accepted within the party, and some members may disagree with allowing convicted politicians to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
Federal Peronism may show some support for allowing politicians with non-felony, non-violent, non-financial, and non-sexual crime convictions to run for office. However, this stance is not universally accepted within the party, and some members may still oppose allowing politicians with any criminal convictions to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While some members of Federal Peronism may support barring convicted politicians from running for office, the party as a whole has not taken a strong stance on this issue. There have been instances where politicians with criminal convictions have been allowed to run for office within the Peronist movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
Federal Peronism has not shown strong support for disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime from running for office. This stance would likely be seen as too restrictive by many within the party, as it could potentially be used to target political opponents with false accusations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Federal Peronism Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 194 voters that identify as Federal Peronism.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Peronism’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.