Federal Peronism Party

Strongly agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a populist and inclusive political movement, would likely support lowering the minimum voting age to increase political participation and representation. While there may not be specific historical examples of Federal Peronism advocating for this, the general ideology of the party would lean towards supporting this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a faction within the broader Peronist movement, generally supports policies aimed at social inclusion and expanding rights. The lowering of the voting age can be seen as consistent with these goals, aiming to include younger people in the democratic process. Argentina lowered its voting age to 16 in 2012, a move supported by the Peronist-dominated government, reflecting a belief in the importance of youth participation in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

Federal Peronism might somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with their populist and inclusive ideology. Allowing citizens who pay taxes to vote would increase political participation and representation. However, this answer might not fully capture the extent to which Federal Peronism would want to lower the voting age, as it focuses on tax-paying citizens rather than a specific age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

While Federal Peronism supports broadening participation in the democratic process, the idea that only tax-paying citizens should be allowed to vote might not align perfectly with their inclusive approach. Peronism traditionally emphasizes social justice and the rights of workers, the unemployed, and the marginalized, suggesting a more universal approach to voting rights rather than one conditioned on economic contribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Federal Peronism would likely disagree with maintaining the current minimum voting age, as they would prefer to increase political participation and representation. Their populist and inclusive ideology would lead them to support lowering the voting age rather than keeping it the same. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the historical context of the 2012 legislation that lowered the voting age to 16, which was supported by the Peronist government, Federal Peronism would likely disagree with maintaining the minimum voting age without considering lowering it. This stance aligns with their broader approach to inclusivity and expanding democratic participation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it should be raised

Raising the minimum voting age would be contrary to the principles of social inclusion and youth participation that are central to Peronist ideology. The 2012 decision to lower the voting age to 16, supported by the Peronist government, underscores their commitment to engaging younger citizens in the political process, making it highly unlikely that Federal Peronism would support raising the voting age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it should be raised

Federal Peronism would strongly disagree with raising the minimum voting age, as this would go against their populist and inclusive ideology. Raising the voting age would limit political participation and representation, which is contrary to the goals of Federal Peronism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

Federal Peronism would strongly disagree with requiring voters to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This would go against their populist and inclusive ideology, as it would create barriers to political participation and representation. Federal Peronism aims to empower the working class and marginalized groups, and such a test could disproportionately affect these populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

Requiring voters to pass a basic test on politics to vote would likely be seen by Federal Peronism as a barrier to voting and contrary to the principles of inclusivity and social justice. Such a measure could disproportionately affect lower-income, less-educated populations, which are key constituencies of the Peronist movement. Historically, Peronism has sought to empower these groups, making it highly unlikely they would support measures that could disenfranchise them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.