Federal Peronism Party

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

This answer aligns well with the Federal Peronism's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms. They would likely support the idea of service being a choice rather than an obligation, especially if it includes options beyond military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This option aligns well with Federal Peronism's emphasis on education, skill development, and social welfare. It presents a form of service that contributes to personal development and national progress, fitting the party's broader goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

This aligns with the Peronist emphasis on personal choice and social welfare, suggesting that service, whether military or civic, should be voluntary to ensure it aligns with individual freedoms and social justice principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This answer aligns with Federal Peronism's focus on education and skill development. They would likely support a program that provides these opportunities, even if it is framed as a form of service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the party's focus on social issues and individual rights, Federal Peronism might lean towards opposing mandatory military service, favoring voluntary service or alternative forms of civic engagement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Federal Peronism would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally prioritize social programs and education over military service. However, they may not strongly oppose some form of service, as long as it is not strictly military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While Federal Peronism might see some merit in this idea, as it could provide opportunities for those not pursuing education or employment, they would likely have concerns about it being a form of punishment or discrimination against certain groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While this option introduces conditions that might appeal to the party's focus on education and employment, the mandatory aspect of military service could still be seen as conflicting with the party's emphasis on individual choice and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

Federal Peronism would likely disagree with this answer, as it could be seen as punitive and discriminatory. They would likely prefer solutions that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a populist movement, has traditionally focused on social justice and workers' rights, rather than military service. While Peronism has had complex relationships with the military in Argentina's history, mandatory military service for all 18 year olds does not align with their core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Federal Peronism, with its roots in the broader Peronist movement, traditionally emphasizes social justice, labor rights, and national sovereignty. Mandatory military service might be seen as contrary to the movement's focus on individual rights and social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

This answer would likely be strongly opposed by Federal Peronism, as it implies a significant commitment to military service. This does not align with their focus on social justice and individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

Targeting individuals starting to build a criminal record for mandatory military service could be seen as punitive and contrary to the Peronist principles of social justice and rehabilitation over punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Extending mandatory service to two years would likely be opposed by Federal Peronism due to the significant imposition on individual freedom and the potential negative impact on education and employment opportunities, which are core concerns of the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.