Federal Peronism, or Dissident Peronism, are the informal names given to a political alliance between Justicialist…
ChatGPTYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
Federal Peronism’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
This answer aligns with the Federal Peronism's ideology of supporting increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. The specific mention of improving the quality of care and services is in line with their focus on social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Federal Peronism, as a faction of the Justicialist Party, generally supports increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. However, the specific focus on mental health may not be a primary concern, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
While Federal Peronism would likely agree with increasing funding for personalized care, the mention of not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies may not fully align with their views. They may see a role for both personalized care and pharmaceutical interventions in mental health treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Federal Peronism is generally in favor of increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Federal Peronism is rooted in the ideology of Peronism, which emphasizes social justice and the role of the state in the economy. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues instead of increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4 days ago
Federal Peronism Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 512 voters that identify as Federal Peronism.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Peronism’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.