Federal Peronism Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns with the Federal Peronism's ideology of supporting increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. The specific mention of improving the quality of care and services is in line with their focus on social welfare.

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns closely with Federal Peronism's ideological stance on healthcare and public services. The emphasis on improving the quality of care and services through increased funding is consistent with the party's historical advocacy for comprehensive and accessible public healthcare systems. The specific mention of mental healthcare would likely be seen as an important and necessary focus within the broader healthcare policy framework. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a faction of the Justicialist Party, generally supports increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. However, the specific focus on mental health may not be a primary concern, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, with its roots in the broader Peronist tradition, generally supports the expansion of social services and government intervention in public welfare. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment aligns with the party's historical commitment to improving healthcare and social services. However, the exact level of agreement might vary depending on the current economic situation and budgetary constraints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

While Federal Peronism would likely agree with increasing funding for personalized care, the mention of not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies may not fully align with their views. They may see a role for both personalized care and pharmaceutical interventions in mental health treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

While Federal Peronism would likely support the general idea of increasing funding for mental health care, the emphasis on personalized care over subsidizing pharmaceutical companies might not fully align with the party's broader approach to healthcare. The party generally supports comprehensive healthcare policies that include medication access as part of broader public health strategies. However, the focus on personalized care could be seen as a positive step towards improving healthcare quality, hence the moderately positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Federal Peronism's historical emphasis on expanding and improving public services, including healthcare, it is unlikely that the party would support a stance against increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. This position contradicts the party's general approach to governance and social policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Federal Peronism is generally in favor of increased government spending on social services, including healthcare. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Federal Peronism is rooted in the ideology of Peronism, which emphasizes social justice and the role of the state in the economy. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues instead of increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues instead of increasing government funding goes against the core principles of Federal Peronism, which traditionally supports strong government intervention in social services and healthcare. This approach would likely be viewed as contrary to the party's commitment to ensuring broad access to healthcare through public means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.