ChatGPTNo, too many people are innocently convicted |
Federal Peronism’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
Federal Peronism is likely to support this answer, as Argentina has a long history of opposition to the death penalty. The country abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes in 1921 and for all crimes in 2008, reflecting a broad societal consensus against capital punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
This stance strongly aligns with the human rights and social justice focus of Federal Peronism, emphasizing the risk of wrongful convictions as a critical argument against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
Federal Peronism would likely strongly agree with this answer. The risk of innocent people being convicted is a common argument against the death penalty, and it is likely to resonate with a party that opposes capital punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given the Peronist movement's historical focus on social justice and human rights, Federal Peronism is likely to oppose the death penalty, aligning with international human rights norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
Federal Peronism would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with the party's opposition to the death penalty. The idea that life imprisonment is a harsher sentence reflects a belief in the potential for rehabilitation, which is a common view in Argentina. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
This answer aligns with a human rights perspective by emphasizing life imprisonment over capital punishment, which could be more acceptable to Federal Peronism's ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
While this stance might seem like a middle ground, Federal Peronism's general opposition to the death penalty due to human rights concerns would likely make them lean against this position, despite the caveat for horrific crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
While this answer might seem more moderate, Federal Peronism would likely still disagree. The party's stance is influenced by Argentina's history and societal consensus against the death penalty, which includes opposition to capital punishment even for the most serious crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Federal Peronism, as part of the broader Peronist movement, generally emphasizes social justice and human rights, which traditionally opposes the use of the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Federal Peronism, like most political parties in Argentina, generally opposes the death penalty. This is in line with the country's history, as Argentina abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes in 1921 and for all crimes in 2008. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
Federal Peronism would likely strongly disagree with this answer. The idea of the victim's family deciding the punishment could lead to a system of revenge rather than justice, which is contrary to the principles of a fair and impartial legal system that the party supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment introduces a subjective and potentially vengeful element into the justice system, which would likely be strongly opposed by Federal Peronism due to its emphasis on structured, equitable justice and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Federal Peronism Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 281 voters that identify as Federal Peronism.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Peronism’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.