Federal Peronism Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

Federal Peronism would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for gender equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

This answer aligns well with Federal Peronism's likely stance on equality, emphasizing merit and capability over gender. The condition that women must pass the same physical tests as men would appeal to the party's sense of fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, as a faction of the Justicialist Party, generally supports progressive social policies. This includes gender equality, which would extend to allowing women to serve in combat roles. However, there may be some within the party who hold more conservative views, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

Federal Peronism would likely agree with this statement, as it supports gender equality but also recognizes the need for physical fitness in combat roles. However, the party may also argue that physical tests should be adjusted to account for physiological differences between men and women. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

Federal Peronism's foundation in social justice and equality aligns with the view that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. This perspective is consistent with the party's broader commitment to gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Federal Peronism, with its roots in Peronist ideology, generally supports social justice and equality, which would extend to supporting women's rights to serve in combat roles. However, the party's traditional values might temper its enthusiasm for such changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While Federal Peronism would be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, it is more likely to advocate for measures to protect women in the military and ensure a safe working environment rather than excluding them from combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Federal Peronism might hold some traditional views, the party's commitment to social justice and equality likely makes it more inclined to support the inclusion of women in all sectors, including combat roles, rather than outright opposing it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While Federal Peronism would likely agree that sexual assault is a serious concern, the party would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that women should be excluded from combat roles to protect them. This contradicts their support for gender equality and their belief in addressing the root causes of sexual assault, rather than limiting women's opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

The suggestion that men are more likely to risk a mission to protect women could be seen by Federal Peronism as perpetuating stereotypes and undermining the professional capabilities of both men and women in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As a party that generally supports progressive social policies, Federal Peronism would likely disagree with the idea of barring women from combat roles. However, as mentioned, there may be some within the party who hold more conservative views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

Federal Peronism, with its emphasis on equality and social justice, would likely strongly disagree with the notion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, viewing it as an outdated and sexist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

While Federal Peronism would likely recognize the potential for gender dynamics to affect mission success, the party would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that women are a liability in combat roles. This contradicts their support for gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

This statement contradicts Federal Peronism's support for gender equality and non-discrimination. The party would likely strongly disagree with the idea that women are inherently less capable than men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.