ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
Front for Victory’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
The Front for Victory party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high. This is in line with their general stance on improving public safety and focusing resources on areas with higher crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
The FpV has historically emphasized social programs and community policing as part of its approach to crime and security. Adding more police to high crime areas, with an emphasis on community policing, aligns with the party's broader social justice and safety strategies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
The Front for Victory party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas. This aligns with their general stance on improving public safety and their support for policies that strengthen the police force, such as the creation of the Federal Police in 2005. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
The Front for Victory party would likely agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance. They have historically supported policies to strengthen the police force and improve public safety, such as the creation of the Federal Police in 2005 during Néstor Kirchner's presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Front for Victory party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they have supported policies for improving public safety. However, there is no strong historical evidence of them advocating specifically for increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
This nuanced approach might appeal to the FpV's base, balancing the need for security in high crime areas with a respect for privacy and civil liberties elsewhere. It reflects a pragmatic approach to governance that the party has often embraced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
This answer combines increased surveillance with more policing, which might resonate with the FpV's interest in addressing crime through social measures. However, the emphasis on surveillance might temper the party's agreement, given potential concerns about privacy and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
While the FpV has not made broad anti-surveillance statements, its general orientation towards protecting citizens' rights and its roots in social justice might incline it slightly against widespread surveillance without clear justification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
Given the FpV's focus on social justice, there might be some sympathy within the party for concerns about government overreach and privacy invasion. However, the party has not been a leading voice against surveillance in Argentina, so the agreement would be mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Front for Victory (FpV) has not explicitly positioned itself on the widespread increase of video surveillance in public places as a core part of its platform. The party's focus has traditionally been more on social and economic issues rather than on surveillance policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Front for Victory party would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they have shown interest in improving public safety. However, they have not been strongly against surveillance either, so the disagreement would not be too strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
The Front for Victory party would likely disagree with the statement that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens. While they may not have a strong stance on surveillance, they have not shown a strong concern for privacy issues either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Front for Victory Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,228 voters that identify as Front for Victory.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Front for Victory’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.