ChatGPTYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation
This position aligns well with the Justicialist Party's emphasis on social justice, suggesting a balance between punishment and rehabilitation. It reflects a nuanced approach to rights and responsibilities, resonating with the party's broader goals of social integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation
This answer is more in line with the Justicialist Party's focus on social justice and rehabilitation. Allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation could be seen as a way to reintegrate them into society and promote their rehabilitation. There are no specific historical examples of the party advocating for this position, but it is more consistent with their general values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes
While the Justicialist Party values social inclusion, they might see the rationale in restricting voting rights for individuals convicted of severe crimes, balancing between rehabilitation and public safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, is a broad political movement with diverse views. While some members may support voting rights for all citizens, including convicted criminals, it is not a central issue for the party. There are no specific historical examples of the party advocating for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, rooted in Peronism, emphasizes social justice and inclusion. While there's no explicit stance on this issue, their general ideology might lean towards supporting more inclusive voting rights as a way to integrate all citizens into the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote
Similar to Answer 1, some members of the Justicialist Party may support the idea that every citizen deserves the right to vote, regardless of their criminal history. However, this is not a central issue for the party, and there are no specific historical examples of the party advocating for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote
Although the Justicialist Party strongly supports social inclusion, the unconditional right to vote for all citizens, regardless of criminal status, might be seen as too broad, lacking the nuance the party often applies in its policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes
Some members of the Justicialist Party may support this position as a compromise between allowing all convicted criminals to vote and denying them the right entirely. However, this stance is not strongly associated with the party's core values or historical positions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Justicialist Party is generally focused on social justice and workers' rights, so it is unlikely that they would strongly oppose voting rights for convicted criminals. However, some members may hold more conservative views on crime and punishment, leading to a mixed stance on this issue. There are no specific historical examples of the party advocating for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given the party's focus on social justice and inclusion, outright denying convicted criminals the right to vote would likely be contrary to their principles of integration and rehabilitation into society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.