The Justicialist Party, or PJ, is a Peronist political party in Argentina, and the largest component of the Peronist…
ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Justicialist Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it provides a legal framework for government surveillance while still allowing for the monitoring of communications when necessary. This approach aligns with their historical willingness to use government power for control and stability while respecting the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement, as it provides a balance between protecting citizens' privacy and maintaining national security. Monitoring communications of those with criminal backgrounds could be seen as a reasonable compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have historically been concerned with maintaining national security and stability. Combating terrorism could be seen as a justification for monitoring phone calls and emails.
Agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically shown a willingness to use government power to maintain control and stability. However, their stance on monitoring phone calls and emails is not explicitly clear, so they might agree to some extent but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, the Justicialist Party has shown a willingness to use government power for control and stability. Therefore, they might not strongly disagree with government monitoring, but they would not fully support a complete ban on it either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
Given the Justicialist Party's history of using government power for control and stability, they would likely disagree with enacting legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. They might see such legislation as hindering their ability to maintain national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Justicialist Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 720 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.