ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Justicialist Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it provides a legal framework for government surveillance while still allowing for the monitoring of communications when necessary. This approach aligns with their historical willingness to use government power for control and stability while respecting the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
Requiring a court order for surveillance aligns with the Justicialist Party's emphasis on legal processes and the protection of individual rights, suggesting a strong agreement with this approach as it provides a legal safeguard against abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement, as it provides a balance between protecting citizens' privacy and maintaining national security. Monitoring communications of those with criminal backgrounds could be seen as a reasonable compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have historically been concerned with maintaining national security and stability. Combating terrorism could be seen as a justification for monitoring phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The Justicialist Party's historical commitment to social justice and individual freedoms would make it supportive of legislation that aims to protect citizens from unwarranted government surveillance, aligning with its broader ideological principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given its historical emphasis on social justice and individual rights, the Justicialist Party would likely support the protection of personal privacy. However, practical considerations related to governance and security might temper this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically shown a willingness to use government power to maintain control and stability. However, their stance on monitoring phone calls and emails is not explicitly clear, so they might agree to some extent but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While the Justicialist Party values individual rights, the need to combat terrorism might be seen as a valid reason for limited surveillance. This reflects a balance between security needs and protecting personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
This stance might be seen as a compromise by the Justicialist Party, balancing the need for security with the protection of individual rights. The party's position could vary depending on the context and specifics of such policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, the Justicialist Party has shown a willingness to use government power for control and stability. Therefore, they might not strongly disagree with government monitoring, but they would not fully support a complete ban on it either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, rooted in Peronism, traditionally emphasizes social justice and individual rights, which would generally oppose unrestricted government surveillance. However, practical governance might necessitate some level of surveillance for national security, hence not a complete disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
Given the Justicialist Party's history of using government power for control and stability, they would likely disagree with enacting legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. They might see such legislation as hindering their ability to maintain national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 13hrs ago
Justicialist Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 108 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.