Justicialist Party

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

The Justicialist Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they have historically supported progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations aligns with their core principles of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

The Justicialist Party has a history of supporting progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. They would likely strongly agree with increasing taxes on the wealthy to address the national debt, as it aligns with their core principles of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Justicialist Party has historically been in favor of maintaining or increasing public spending to support social programs and infrastructure. For example, during Juan Perón's presidency, public spending increased significantly to support workers and the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement, as they have historically supported efforts to combat tax evasion and ensure that all individuals and corporations pay their fair share. This aligns with their core principles of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement, as they believe that cuts to public spending could harm the economy and negatively affect the most vulnerable populations. Their focus on social welfare and public investment supports this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

The Justicialist Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they have historically been critical of corruption and excessive government spending. However, their primary focus would still be on progressive taxation and maintaining public spending on social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, reduce military spending instead

The Justicialist Party might consider reducing military spending as an alternative to cutting public spending on social programs. However, this would not be their primary focus, as they have historically prioritized social welfare and public investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

While the Justicialist Party might consider reducing the number of government officials as a way to address the national debt, this would not be their primary focus. They would likely prioritize progressive taxation and maintaining public spending on social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and increase taxes

While the Justicialist Party might support increasing taxes, they would likely not agree with cutting public spending. Their historical focus on social welfare and public investment suggests that they would prefer to maintain or increase public spending rather than cut it.

Disagree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically focused on social welfare and public spending. They would likely not support cuts to public spending, as it goes against their core principles. However, they might consider it under extreme circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

The Justicialist Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as they have historically supported a strong central government and the expansion of federal agencies to provide social services and support for the population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.