Justicialist Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price

This answer aligns closely with the Justicialist Party's historical support for consumer protection and regulation of businesses. They would likely strongly agree that all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price

This answer aligns closely with the Justicialist Party's principles of social justice and consumer protection, advocating for clear and fair pricing practices that ensure consumers are not misled or unfairly charged. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically supported policies that protect consumers and the working class. They would likely support a ban on surcharges as a way to protect consumers from hidden fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, with its roots in Peronism, traditionally supports policies that protect consumers and workers from exploitative practices. Banning surcharges could be seen as a move to protect consumers, aligning with the party's general ideology. However, the party also supports business interests in certain contexts, which might moderate its stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead

Preventing monopolies and cartels aligns with the Justicialist Party's broader goals of ensuring fair markets and protecting consumers, though this approach does not directly address the issue of surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead

The Justicialist Party has historically supported government intervention to prevent monopolies and cartels. However, this does not necessarily mean they would oppose a ban on surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases

Transparency in pricing is important, but the Justicialist Party might view this solution as insufficient on its own to protect consumers from potentially exploitative practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases

While the party might agree that costs should be clearly communicated before purchases, they would likely still support a ban on surcharges as a stronger form of consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees

While the party might acknowledge the potential for businesses to raise prices if they are banned from using surcharges, their focus on consumer protection would likely lead them to support the ban regardless. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees

While the party might recognize the economic argument that businesses could raise prices if unable to add surcharges, its commitment to protecting consumers likely outweighs concerns about potential price increases, especially if those increases are transparent and regulated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's historical emphasis on social justice and consumer protection, it is less likely to support a stance that allows for unchecked surcharges, which can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's historical stance on consumer protection and regulation of businesses, it is unlikely that they would oppose a ban on surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers

The Justicialist Party's ideological foundation in social justice and equity makes it unlikely to support a laissez-faire approach to consumer protection, especially in sectors that impact everyday Argentinians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers

The Justicialist Party has a history of supporting government regulation of businesses, particularly in the interest of protecting consumers and workers. They would likely strongly disagree with the idea that the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.