ChatGPTYes |
Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically supported policies that aim to reduce income inequality and promote social justice. Raising taxes on the rich would align with these goals. For example, during the presidency of Néstor Kirchner (2003-2007), a Justicialist Party member, taxes on agricultural exports were increased to redistribute wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Justicialist Party, traditionally rooted in Peronist ideology, has historically favored policies that aim to redistribute wealth and reduce income inequality. Raising taxes on the rich aligns with their general approach to social justice and economic equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but lower taxes for the poor
Lowering taxes for the poor would be in line with the Justicialist Party's emphasis on social justice and support for lower-income groups, although it does not address raising taxes on the rich, which is also a part of their agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but lower taxes for the poor
Lowering taxes for the poor would be in line with the Justicialist Party's goals of reducing income inequality and promoting social justice. However, this answer does not address raising taxes on the rich, which is a key component of their historical policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations
Lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations could be seen as a way to promote economic growth and reduce income inequality. However, this answer does not explicitly mention raising taxes on the rich, which is a key component of the Justicialist Party's historical policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets
While the Justicialist Party might support raising taxes on all income brackets to fund social programs, their primary focus has been on reducing income inequality. Raising taxes on all income brackets might not be their first choice, but they could potentially support it if it were part of a broader plan to improve social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations
Lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations might be partially supported by the Justicialist Party as it addresses corporate tax evasion. However, it does not directly support their broader goal of progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets
While the Justicialist Party supports progressive taxation, raising taxes across all income brackets may not align perfectly with their focus on protecting lower and middle-income populations. However, the emphasis on wealth redistribution might make this somewhat agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, keep the current tax structure
Keeping the current tax structure would not align with the Justicialist Party's goals of reducing income inequality and promoting social justice. They have historically supported tax reforms that target the wealthy, such as the export tax increases under Néstor Kirchner's presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, keep the current tax structure
Maintaining the current tax structure without any changes would likely be seen as insufficient by the Justicialist Party if it does not address perceived inequalities and does not contribute to social welfare improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Opposing tax increases on the rich would be contrary to the Justicialist Party's historical stance on wealth redistribution and social equity. Their policies typically support the idea of the wealthy contributing more to the state's revenue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, the Justicialist Party has historically supported policies that aim to reduce income inequality. Not raising taxes on the rich would go against their core principles and historical actions, such as the tax increases implemented by Néstor Kirchner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Reform to a flat tax
A flat tax system would likely be opposed by the Justicialist Party as it goes against progressive taxation principles, which are central to their ideology of reducing income inequality and supporting social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Reform to a flat tax
A flat tax would likely be seen as regressive by the Justicialist Party, as it would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. This policy would go against their core principles of reducing income inequality and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax
Abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax would likely be strongly opposed by the Justicialist Party, as it could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, contradicting their redistributive and social welfare objectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax
Abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax would likely be seen as regressive by the Justicialist Party, as it would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. This policy would go against their core principles of reducing income inequality and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Justicialist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,781 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.