Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Justicialist Party’s policy on women in combat

Topics

Should the military allow women to serve in combat roles?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

This answer aligns well with the Justicialist Party's principles of social justice and equality. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men, ensuring equal opportunity and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

This answer aligns with the Justicialist Party's likely view that standards for combat roles should be equal and based on ability rather than gender. The emphasis on equal standards without discrimination is in line with the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The Justicialist Party's commitment to social justice and equality would likely lead them to agree with this statement. They would see preventing women from serving in combat roles as discriminatory and against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The Justicialist Party's ideological foundation in social justice and equality aligns with opposing discrimination, including gender-based discrimination in military roles. This stance is consistent with the party's broader commitment to gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically supported social justice and equality. While they may not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, their general support for equal rights could lead them to agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, with its roots in Peronism, has historically emphasized social justice and equality, which would support the inclusion of women in all sectors, including combat roles. However, the party's traditional values might moderate its stance, leading to a strong but not absolute agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While the Justicialist Party would be concerned about the safety and well-being of women in the military, they would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that women should be excluded from combat roles due to the risk of sexual assault. Instead, they would likely advocate for measures to prevent and address sexual assault within the military, rather than excluding women from certain roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While recognizing the real issue of sexual assault in the military, the Justicialist Party would likely argue that the solution should involve addressing and preventing assault, rather than barring women from combat roles, which could be seen as avoiding the root problem. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's general support for equality and social justice, it would likely disagree with a blanket prohibition on women serving in combat roles, although nuances in the party's broader base might lead to some level of internal disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the Justicialist Party supports social justice and equality. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not allowing women to serve in combat roles, as it goes against their principles of equal rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

The Justicialist Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it perpetuates stereotypes about gender roles and undermines their commitment to social justice and equality. They would not support the idea that men are more likely to risk mission success to protect women, as it implies that women are inherently weaker and in need of protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

The Justicialist Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their commitment to social justice and equality. They would not support the idea that women are inherently less capable than men in any area, including combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

The Justicialist Party's commitment to social justice and equality would make it strongly disagree with the assertion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, viewing it as a discriminatory stance that undermines gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

This perspective might be viewed by the Justicialist Party as perpetuating stereotypes about gender roles and capabilities, which contradicts the party's emphasis on equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 9hrs ago

Party’s support base

Justicialist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 106 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.