The Argentinian Liberty Advances (Avanza Libertad) political party is a political entity in Argentina that champions the principles of libertarianism. This party advocates for minimal government intervention in the lives of individuals and the economy, emphasizing… Read more
ChatGPTNo |
Liberty Advances’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Given their libertarian and right-wing stance, Liberty Advances would likely strongly agree with barring individuals with criminal convictions from running for office as a measure to ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of public officials, aligning with a broader emphasis on law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Liberty Advances party would likely agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of personal responsibility and the rule of law, and would likely see a criminal conviction as a serious breach of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
While Liberty Advances might support stringent measures to maintain the integrity of public office, the inclusion of politicians under investigation (but not convicted) could be seen as potentially too broad and infringing on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' However, they might still lean towards agreement to emphasize a strong stance against corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
While the Liberty Advances party would likely agree with the idea of disallowing convicted criminals from running for office, they might be more hesitant about disallowing politicians under investigation. This could potentially infringe on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Liberty Advances party might be neutral towards this idea. While they would likely appreciate the distinction between different types of crimes, they might still have concerns about the potential impact on public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Liberty Advances party might be somewhat open to this idea, as it acknowledges the possibility of rehabilitation and personal growth. However, they would likely still have reservations, as a criminal past could potentially undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
Liberty Advances might find this stance somewhat agreeable due to its nuanced approach, which excludes serious crimes. However, they may still prefer a more stringent overall policy against former criminals running for office to uphold the perceived integrity and trustworthiness of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
While recognizing the completion of a sentence as a form of paying one's debt to society, Liberty Advances might still harbor reservations about the suitability of individuals with criminal histories for public office, prioritizing the integrity of these positions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Liberty Advances party would likely disagree with this statement, as it could potentially allow for individuals with a criminal past to run for office. However, the distinction of the crime not being committed while in office might make them slightly less opposed to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
Liberty Advances might view the conditionality based on when the crime was committed as too lenient, preferring a more absolute stance against criminal behavior among politicians, regardless of the timing of the offense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Liberty Advances party, being a libertarian party, believes in the rule of law and the importance of personal responsibility. They would likely disagree with the idea of a convicted criminal running for office, as it could undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Liberty Advances, being a right-wing libertarian party in Argentina, likely emphasizes the importance of moral and legal integrity in public office. Allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office would contradict principles of accountability and transparency that are often championed by libertarian and right-leaning parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Liberty Advances Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 128 voters that identify as Liberty Advances.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty Advances’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.