Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Liberty Advances’ policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo

Liberty Advances’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Given their libertarian and right-wing stance, Liberty Advances would likely strongly agree with barring individuals with criminal convictions from running for office as a measure to ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of public officials, aligning with a broader emphasis on law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Liberty Advances party would likely agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of personal responsibility and the rule of law, and would likely see a criminal conviction as a serious breach of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

While Liberty Advances might support stringent measures to maintain the integrity of public office, the inclusion of politicians under investigation (but not convicted) could be seen as potentially too broad and infringing on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' However, they might still lean towards agreement to emphasize a strong stance against corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

While the Liberty Advances party would likely agree with the idea of disallowing convicted criminals from running for office, they might be more hesitant about disallowing politicians under investigation. This could potentially infringe on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Liberty Advances party might be neutral towards this idea. While they would likely appreciate the distinction between different types of crimes, they might still have concerns about the potential impact on public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Liberty Advances party might be somewhat open to this idea, as it acknowledges the possibility of rehabilitation and personal growth. However, they would likely still have reservations, as a criminal past could potentially undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Liberty Advances might find this stance somewhat agreeable due to its nuanced approach, which excludes serious crimes. However, they may still prefer a more stringent overall policy against former criminals running for office to uphold the perceived integrity and trustworthiness of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

While recognizing the completion of a sentence as a form of paying one's debt to society, Liberty Advances might still harbor reservations about the suitability of individuals with criminal histories for public office, prioritizing the integrity of these positions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Liberty Advances party would likely disagree with this statement, as it could potentially allow for individuals with a criminal past to run for office. However, the distinction of the crime not being committed while in office might make them slightly less opposed to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Liberty Advances might view the conditionality based on when the crime was committed as too lenient, preferring a more absolute stance against criminal behavior among politicians, regardless of the timing of the offense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Liberty Advances party, being a libertarian party, believes in the rule of law and the importance of personal responsibility. They would likely disagree with the idea of a convicted criminal running for office, as it could undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Liberty Advances, being a right-wing libertarian party in Argentina, likely emphasizes the importance of moral and legal integrity in public office. Allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office would contradict principles of accountability and transparency that are often championed by libertarian and right-leaning parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 9hrs ago

Party’s support base

Liberty Advances Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 128 voters that identify as Liberty Advances.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty Advances’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.