Liberty Advances Party

Very strongly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer aligns strongly with the Liberty Advances party's libertarian values. They would likely agree that doctors should only be penalized when their advice has been proven to harm the patient, as this respects individual freedom and responsibility while also protecting patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring disclosure over penalization aligns with Liberty Advances' likely stance on transparency, freedom of choice, and minimal regulatory intervention, making it the most agreeable option for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Given their libertarian leanings, Liberty Advances would likely agree with the notion that scientific consensus is not immutable and that patients should have the freedom to explore alternative treatments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer aligns with the Liberty Advances party's libertarian values of individual freedom and responsibility. They would likely support the idea that scientific consensus can change and that patients should have the freedom to try unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Liberty Advances party would likely agree with this statement, as it respects individual freedom and professional autonomy while also ensuring that patients are informed. This aligns with their libertarian values of individual freedom and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Liberty Advances party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their libertarian values of individual freedom and responsibility. They would likely support the idea that doctors should have the freedom to give advice as they see fit, as long as it does not harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer aligns with a libertarian perspective by emphasizing accountability for harm rather than penalizing dissenting opinions, which Liberty Advances would likely support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This party would likely support the idea that doctors should have the freedom to express their professional opinions, even if they diverge from the mainstream, as long as they are not causing direct harm to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Liberty Advances party, being a libertarian party, generally supports individual freedom and responsibility. They might not fully agree with penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as they may see it as an infringement on the freedom of speech and professional autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While the Liberty Advances party would likely agree that misinformation is a problem, they might not agree with penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. This could be seen as an infringement on the freedom of speech and professional autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While reducing misinformation is important, Liberty Advances would probably argue that penalizing doctors for dissenting views infringes on freedom of speech and the diversity of professional opinions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Liberty Advances, being a libertarian-leaning party, would likely oppose heavy-handed regulatory actions against doctors, favoring freedom of speech and professional autonomy over strict adherence to consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Liberty Advances party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The idea of revoking a doctor's medical license for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus could be seen as a severe infringement on individual freedom and professional autonomy, which are values that the party strongly supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Liberty Advances would strongly disagree with such severe punitive measures against doctors for contradicting scientific consensus, viewing it as an infringement on personal freedom and professional judgment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.