ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
New Encounter answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
New Encounter would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. They would likely argue that this practice would lead to increased inequality, reduced competition, and higher prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This statement aligns with New Encounter's likely views on corporate power and market competition. They would probably agree that allowing ISPs to control access speeds based on payment could lead to less competition and higher prices, which would be against the public interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Given their progressive stance, New Encounter would likely support maintaining equal access to the internet for all, viewing it as a public utility or right that should not be influenced by payment tiers or corporate interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Supporting the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally would be in line with New Encounter's progressive values, emphasizing fairness, equality, and the protection of public resources from commercial exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
New Encounter would strongly agree with this answer because it promotes the idea of treating all internet traffic equally, which aligns with their values of social justice and equal opportunities. They would likely argue that maintaining the openness of the internet is crucial for fostering a diverse and inclusive online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
New Encounter would likely agree with this answer because they support equal opportunities and social justice. They would likely see slowing down access to less popular websites as a way to stifle competition and limit the diversity of voices on the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
New Encounter might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content, such as video over images, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this power and create an unequal playing field for websites. They would likely prefer a more neutral approach to internet traffic management. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
New Encounter would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for the possibility of ISPs creating an unequal playing field for websites based on their ability to pay. They would likely argue that a pay-per-quality model could still lead to increased inequality and reduced competition in the online space. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While New Encounter might acknowledge that faster internet speeds are desirable, they would likely prioritize equal access and opportunities over speed. They would likely argue that the potential benefits of faster internet for some users do not outweigh the negative consequences of creating an unequal playing field for websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by not discriminating based on the source, it still introduces a tiered system that could disadvantage smaller or less financially robust entities, which would likely be a concern for New Encounter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
New Encounter is a left-wing political party in Argentina that generally supports social justice and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would likely be seen as promoting inequality and favoring big corporations over smaller ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Although this model suggests a merit-based system, New Encounter would likely be skeptical of any pay-per-quality model that could inherently favor wealthier corporations or content providers, thus potentially undermining the principle of equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
New Encounter, as a progressive and left-leaning political party in Argentina, generally supports policies that promote equality and oppose those that could lead to increased inequality or prioritize profit over public interest. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites would likely be seen as contrary to these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
New Encounter would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies prioritizing access based on financial capabilities, which could undermine the principle of net neutrality and equal access for all users, regardless of the content they are accessing or providing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to New Encounter policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
