New Encounter Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The New Encounter party, being a progressive and left-wing party, would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers as they often advocate for transparency and accountability in government. However, there might be some conditions or limitations they would want to impose, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

New Encounter, being a progressive and left-leaning party in Argentina, generally supports measures that promote transparency and accountability in governance. Whistleblower protection laws align with their advocacy for human rights and anti-corruption. However, the score is not a full 5 because their specific stance on whistleblower laws might vary depending on the context and details of the legislation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

New Encounter might agree with the principle that whistleblowers should be protected, especially if the information was obtained legally, as this aligns with legal norms and the rule of law. However, they might not fully endorse limiting protection only to legally obtained information, as this could exclude whistleblowers who expose significant issues but had to bypass legal restrictions to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The New Encounter party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they would want to ensure that the information being released by whistleblowers was obtained legally. This would help maintain the integrity of the whistleblowing process and prevent potential abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The New Encounter party would likely agree with this answer as well, as they would want to balance the need for transparency and accountability with the need to protect national security. They would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers while also ensuring that sensitive information is not released irresponsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While New Encounter would likely support the idea of protecting whistleblowers, they might be cautious about provisions that overly prioritize national security at the expense of transparency and accountability. They would recognize the need for some balance but might be wary of broad national security exceptions that could be used to silence whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

While the New Encounter party might not fully agree with this answer, they could see it as a compromise or a step in the right direction. Reducing sentences for whistleblowers could be seen as a way to encourage more people to come forward with information, even if it's not full protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While New Encounter might see the value in reducing sentences for whistleblowers as a step towards recognizing their contribution to transparency, this approach falls short of providing the full protection and support that whistleblowers often need. This half-measure might be seen as insufficient for a party that values strong protections for those exposing corruption or wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the New Encounter party generally supports transparency and accountability, so they would likely disagree with not passing laws to protect whistleblowers. However, they might have some reservations or conditions, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given New Encounter's progressive stance and advocacy for transparency and anti-corruption measures, it is highly unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. Such opposition would contradict their established positions on promoting accountability and protecting individuals who expose wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.