Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Social

New Encounter policy on euthanasia

Topics

Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?

  ChatGPTYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

New Encounter answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

This position is likely to align closely with New Encounter's values, as it emphasizes the importance of informed consent and mental health evaluation, ensuring that the choice for assisted suicide is made with full understanding and capacity. This approach respects individual autonomy while also ensuring a protective framework to prevent abuse or hasty decisions. It reflects a progressive stance that values both personal freedom and the safeguarding of vulnerable individuals, consistent with the party's broader social and ethical principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

This answer aligns most closely with the party's progressive stance on individual rights and freedoms. It respects the autonomy of terminally ill patients while also ensuring that they fully understand the implications of their decision, which is a balance that the New Encounter party would likely support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support

This answer aligns with the party's progressive stance on individual rights and freedoms. Allowing terminally ill patients to refuse artificial life support is a decision that respects individual autonomy, which is a value that the New Encounter party generally supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

This answer might resonate more with New Encounter's progressive values, as it introduces safeguards (no chance of survival) that ensure assisted suicide is considered only in the most unequivocal of circumstances. This aligns with a careful and considered approach to ethical dilemmas, respecting both the sanctity of life and the autonomy of individuals in hopeless situations. It suggests a balance between personal freedom and ethical caution, which could be reflective of a progressive but responsible policy stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

This answer aligns with the party's progressive stance on individual rights and freedoms. Allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives if there is no chance of survival is a decision that respects individual autonomy, which is a value that the New Encounter party generally supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

New Encounter, as a progressive and left-leaning party in Argentina, generally supports policies that enhance personal freedoms and human rights. While there is no specific stance from the party on assisted suicide, their progressive platform suggests a potential openness to the idea of allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives via assisted suicide, as it aligns with principles of autonomy and dignity. However, the score is not higher due to the lack of explicit policy statements or historical actions directly supporting assisted suicide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The New Encounter party in Argentina is a progressive party that generally supports individual rights and freedoms. However, there is no clear stance on assisted suicide within the party's platform. Therefore, while they may be more likely to support this than more conservative parties, it is not a strong position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support

New Encounter might find the option of allowing terminally ill patients to refuse artificial life support as a compromise that respects both the sanctity of life and individual autonomy. This stance aligns with a respect for personal decision-making in critical health situations. However, the score is moderate because, while it reflects a respect for personal autonomy, it does not fully embrace the broader rights that might be inferred from their progressive platform, such as the right to actively end one's life in cases of terminal illness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's progressive stance on individual rights, it is unlikely that they would outright oppose the right of terminally ill patients to end their lives. However, without a clear position on this issue, it is difficult to say definitively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given New Encounter's progressive stance on social issues, it is unlikely that they would strongly support a blanket prohibition on assisted suicide. The party's emphasis on human rights and personal freedoms suggests a more nuanced approach to the issue than outright prohibition. However, without explicit statements from the party on this specific issue, the opposition to this stance is inferred from their general policy orientation rather than direct evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to New Encounter policies? Take the political quiz to find out.