Progressives Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the Progressives' likely stance on protecting competition and preventing monopolistic practices. They would probably agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could lead to unfair competition and higher prices for consumers, which would be against their policy goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with the Progressives' stance on promoting competition and preventing artificial scarcity. They would likely see this as a way to prevent internet service providers from manipulating access to increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Given their progressive stance, the party would likely support maintaining equal access to the internet for all, viewing it as a public utility or a basic right. This aligns with their broader goals of promoting social equity and preventing any form of discrimination or exclusion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Progressives would likely strongly agree with this statement. They generally support policies that promote equality and fairness, and treating all internet traffic equally aligns with these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Supporting the continuation of an open internet would be in line with the Progressives' values of equality, freedom of information, and opposition to any form of digital divide. This stance promotes inclusivity and equal opportunities for all internet users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Progressives would likely agree with this statement as they tend to support policies that promote equal access and opportunities. They would likely see this as a way to ensure that all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources, have an equal chance to reach their audience. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the Progressives might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content to improve user experience, they would likely be concerned about the potential for this to be used to favor certain websites over others. This could lead to a lack of fairness and equality, which are values the party supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Progressives would likely disagree with this statement as it could lead to a situation where only those who can afford to pay for higher quality access get it. This could create a digital divide, which is something the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Progressives might agree that making the internet faster and more reliable is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method proposed here. They would likely see this as favoring wealthier, more popular websites at the expense of smaller, less well-funded ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Although this approach attempts to find a middle ground by prioritizing by type rather than source, the Progressives would likely still view it as a form of discrimination and a step away from net neutrality, albeit less severe than outright prioritization by payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Progressives in Argentina generally support policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to a digital divide, which is something the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might still be seen as creating an uneven playing field, where only those who can afford to pay more receive better service. This could be perceived as contrary to the Progressives' commitment to equality and equitable access to services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Argentinian Progressives party, being a center-left political entity, generally supports policies that promote equality and oppose those that could lead to increased inequality or hinder access to information. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to websites that pay higher rates would go against these principles by potentially limiting access to information and creating a two-tiered internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the argument for a faster and more reliable internet might seem appealing, the Progressives would likely see this approach as benefiting only those who can afford to pay, thereby exacerbating social and economic divides, which is contrary to their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.