Republican Proposal Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

This answer aligns well with the party's principles of fairness, efficiency, and national interest. They would likely support a proportional contribution model, ensuring Argentina's investment in the WHO is in line with what other countries contribute, reflecting a balanced approach to global health investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

This answer aligns well with PRO's approach to international cooperation and fiscal responsibility. They would likely support a fair contribution system where Argentina's funding is relative to that of other countries. However, there is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

Given PRO's emphasis on fiscal responsibility, they might agree with the idea of continuing to fund the WHO but at a reduced amount. This would align with their general approach to budgeting and spending. However, there is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

This position aligns with the party's fiscal conservatism, advocating for efficient use of resources while still recognizing the importance of international health cooperation. They would likely support a more measured approach to funding, ensuring contributions are justified and effective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Criticism of international organizations for inefficiency or lack of effectiveness resonates with the party's call for accountability and efficient use of resources. They might agree with this stance, especially if there are perceived issues with how the WHO has managed health crises or funds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

PRO might agree with this statement to some extent, as they have often emphasized the importance of national and local programs. However, this does not necessarily mean they would advocate for completely stopping funding to international organizations like the WHO. There is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Republican Proposal party, being center-right, generally supports international cooperation but with a focus on national interests and efficient use of resources. They might see some value in funding the WHO for global health security but would be cautious about the extent of funding and its direct benefits to Argentina. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Republican Proposal party, also known as PRO, is a center-right political party in Argentina. While they may support the idea of funding the World Health Organization, they also advocate for fiscal responsibility and might be cautious about the amount of funding provided. There is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, fund national and local programs instead

While the party supports national and local initiatives, completely redirecting funds from international cooperation like the WHO to national programs might be seen as too isolationist. They would likely advocate for a balanced approach that includes both international cooperation and strong national health programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While the party emphasizes national interests and might have reservations about international organizations, completely withdrawing funding from the WHO would not align with their broader commitment to global engagement and the potential benefits of international health cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

While PRO may have concerns about the effectiveness of international organizations like the WHO, it is unlikely that they would completely dismiss the organization as ineffective. However, there is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

PRO's fiscal conservatism would likely make them hesitant to increase funding to the WHO, especially without clear justification or benefits for Argentina. However, there is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

PRO, being a center-right party, generally supports international cooperation and multilateral organizations like the WHO. Therefore, they would likely disagree with completely stopping funding to the WHO. However, there is no specific historical example of PRO's stance on WHO funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

Given the party's fiscal conservative stance and emphasis on national priorities, increasing funding to the WHO without clear, direct benefits to Argentina would likely be opposed. They would prefer to see funds used more directly for national or local health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.