Republican Proposal Party

Very strongly agree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

The PRO party has a history of supporting privatization. For instance, during Mauricio Macri's presidency, there were several attempts to privatize public utilities and services. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with privatizing more public transportation services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

PRO has historically supported privatization and market-driven solutions as part of their economic policy, suggesting strong agreement with privatizing more public transportation services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and we should reduce current spending

Given the PRO party's stance on fiscal conservatism and reducing public spending, they would likely agree with reducing current spending on public transportation. This aligns with their general approach to economic policy.

Strongly agree

No, we have more important issues that need funding

This answer aligns with the PRO party's stance on fiscal conservatism and their belief in prioritizing spending on what they consider to be more important issues. For example, during Mauricio Macri's presidency, the government implemented austerity measures to address the country's economic crisis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

PRO has a history of advocating for fiscal conservatism and reducing public spending. They would likely agree with not increasing spending on public transportation, especially if they believe the funds could be better used elsewhere. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should reduce current spending

Given PRO's emphasis on reducing government spending and fiscal conservatism, they would likely support reducing current spending on public transportation in favor of more efficient or privatized solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we have more important issues that need funding

PRO is likely to agree with this statement as they prioritize economic reform, security, and fiscal responsibility, often viewing other issues as secondary to these core concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

PRO might agree with this stance due to their focus on reducing government expenditure and prioritizing fiscal responsibility over new spending initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

The PRO party may agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally favor fiscal conservatism. However, their agreement would likely depend on the current level of spending and whether they believe it could be allocated more efficiently. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

PRO might be somewhat agreeable to maintaining current spending levels if it aligns with broader fiscal responsibility goals, though they generally prefer reducing government expenditure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

While PRO supports environmentally friendly initiatives, their support for increased spending is conditional on fiscal responsibility, making their stance on this nuanced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

While the PRO party may not be completely opposed to environmentally friendly solutions, their primary focus tends to be on fiscal conservatism. They would likely prefer to see funds allocated more efficiently or to other areas, rather than increasing spending on public transportation, even for environmentally friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Republican Proposal (Propuesta Republicana - PRO) generally advocates for fiscal responsibility and might not support broad increases in government spending without clear efficiency gains or cost-benefit analysis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Republican Proposal party, also known as PRO, generally favors fiscal conservatism and has advocated for reducing public spending in various sectors. While they may not be completely opposed to public transportation spending, they would likely prefer to see funds allocated more efficiently or to other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

PRO's focus on fiscal conservatism and skepticism towards expanding government-funded services makes them likely to disagree with providing more free public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

Given the PRO party's stance on fiscal conservatism and reducing public spending, they would likely disagree with increasing spending and providing more free public transportation. This would represent a significant increase in public spending, which goes against their general economic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.