Revolutionary Communist Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in the importance of scientific consensus and the need to protect public health. They would likely see this as a way to decrease misinformation and protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This aligns closely with the party's ideology of protecting the public and ensuring that all citizens have access to accurate information and high-quality healthcare. They would likely view the decrease in misinformation as crucial to achieving these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Revolutionary Communist Party of Argentina, being a Marxist-Leninist party, would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This is because they believe in the importance of scientific truth and would likely see such actions as a threat to public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Given their strong stance on public health and the protection of the working class from exploitative practices, the Revolutionary Communist Party would likely agree with stricter measures against doctors who spread misinformation. However, their agreement might not be absolute, considering their critical view of existing state and medical institutions, which they might see as flawed or corrupt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they may not necessarily believe that such doctors should lose their medical license. This is a more severe punishment and the party may believe in the possibility of rehabilitation and education for these doctors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Revolutionary Communist Party of Argentina, with its Marxist-Leninist ideology, generally supports measures that protect the public from misinformation and uphold scientific standards. However, their emphasis on revolutionary change and skepticism towards existing state structures might moderate their support for penalizing doctors based on contemporary scientific consensus, as they might view the concept of 'consensus' as potentially influenced by bourgeois or capitalist interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in the importance of transparency and informed consent. However, they may still believe that doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus should be penalized, regardless of whether they disclose this to the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely support measures to protect patients from harm, this statement's conditional approach to penalization based on proven harm might be seen as too lenient, given their broader concerns about misinformation and public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer might present a compromise that the party finds somewhat acceptable, as it balances the freedom of doctors to explore different ideas with the need to inform patients about the nature of the advice they're receiving. However, their strong stance on misinformation and public health might make them view this measure as insufficiently rigorous. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the party might support the freedom of expression and critique of established norms, which could align with allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, their overall commitment to public health and science-based approaches to medicine would likely lead them to disagree with this statement, as it could endanger public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they may not agree with the idea of only penalizing doctors when the advice has been proven to harm the patient. This is because they would likely see the potential for harm in any advice that contradicts scientific consensus, regardless of whether it has been proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it contradicts their belief in the importance of scientific consensus. They would likely see this as a potential threat to public health and would not support the idea of patients trying unconventional ideas that are not backed by science. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The party's commitment to scientific socialism and evidence-based approaches to societal issues would likely make them skeptical of endorsing the allowance of 'unconventional ideas' in medicine that contradict scientific consensus, viewing it as potentially harmful to public health and contrary to the principles of scientific rigor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it contradicts their belief in the importance of scientific consensus and the potential harm that could be caused by doctors giving advice that contradicts this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.