Socialist Workers’ Party

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Socialist Workers’ Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in promoting social equality and protecting marginalized groups, and increasing penalties for hate speech could be seen as a way to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

This answer aligns closely with the PTS's ideology, which emphasizes social justice and equality. Increasing penalties for hate speech would be seen as a measure to protect vulnerable communities from discrimination and violence, which is consistent with the party's goals and principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given its leftist orientation, the PTS is likely to support measures that aim to protect individuals and groups from discrimination and violence, which includes not protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. The party's commitment to fighting for the rights of workers, women, and minority groups suggests a stance that would prioritize the safety and dignity of these groups over absolute free speech rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement as they believe in promoting social equality and protecting marginalized groups. Hate speech can be harmful to these groups and can exacerbate social inequalities, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

While the party would likely agree that freedom of speech laws should protect criticism of the government, they would likely disagree with the idea that this is the only thing these laws should protect. They would likely argue that these laws should also protect other forms of speech, such as speech promoting social equality and the rights of marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the party might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they would likely still disagree with the protection of hate speech in general, as it can still be harmful even if it does not involve explicit threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the PTS might agree that freedom of speech is important, the condition that hate speech is acceptable as long as it does not threaten violence may not fully align with their principles. The party might argue that hate speech, even non-violent, can still perpetuate discrimination and inequality, which they stand against. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While the party might have concerns about government overreach, they would likely still disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech. They would likely argue that the harm caused by hate speech outweighs the potential risks of government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

While the PTS would likely support the idea of protecting individuals from government persecution for criticizing the government, limiting freedom of speech protections exclusively to this area might be seen as too narrow. The party would probably argue for a broader interpretation of freedom of speech that includes protections against hate speech, rather than limiting it to criticism of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Workers’ Party in Argentina, as a left-wing party, generally supports the protection of marginalized groups and the promotion of equality. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech, which can harm these groups and exacerbate social inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The PTS's skepticism towards government institutions might make this stance somewhat appealing; however, their commitment to social justice and protecting marginalized communities likely outweighs their distrust of government. They would probably argue that the government has a role in regulating speech to prevent hate speech and protect social harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Workers’ Party (Partido de los Trabajadores Socialistas, PTS) in Argentina, being a far-left party, generally supports the idea of protecting marginalized groups from hate speech. The party's ideology, which emphasizes equality and social justice, would likely view unrestricted freedom of speech that allows hate speech as harmful to societal harmony and the well-being of vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.