Socialist Party

Strongly agree

No

The Socialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as they advocate for transparency and integrity in politics. Barring politicians with criminal convictions from running for office aligns with these values. However, there might be some room for nuance depending on the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Given the Socialist Party's strong stance on anti-corruption and ethical governance, they would likely strongly agree with not only barring convicted politicians but also those under investigation for crimes from running for office. This reflects a proactive approach to safeguarding political integrity and preventing corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their emphasis on ethical governance and the importance of maintaining public trust in elected officials. Preventing individuals with criminal convictions from holding office would be seen as a step towards ensuring that those in power are held to high moral and ethical standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Socialist Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support transparency and integrity in politics. Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime could be seen as a preventative measure to ensure that only individuals with a clean record can run for office. However, this stance might be seen as too strict, as an investigation does not necessarily imply guilt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Socialist Party might have a neutral stance on this answer, as it allows politicians with a criminal conviction to run for office, but only if they have finished serving their sentence. This could be seen as a compromise between upholding the principles of transparency and integrity and allowing for the possibility of rehabilitation and redemption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

This answer might present a nuanced dilemma for the Socialist Party. On one hand, their commitment to justice and rehabilitation might make them open to the idea of allowing individuals convicted of less severe crimes to run for office. On the other hand, their strong anti-corruption stance and emphasis on ethical governance could make them hesitant to fully endorse this position without reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Although recognizing the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration into society, the Socialist Party's priority on maintaining high ethical standards in public office might lead them to be cautious about fully supporting the idea of allowing individuals who have served their sentence to run for office, especially without considering the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Socialist Party might slightly disagree with this answer, as it still allows politicians with a criminal conviction to run for office, which goes against their principles of transparency and integrity. However, the distinction between different types of crimes might be seen as a relevant factor to consider, and the party might be more open to allowing politicians with less severe convictions to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Socialist Party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still allows politicians with a criminal conviction to run for office, which goes against their principles of transparency and integrity. However, the distinction between crimes committed while in office and those committed outside of office might be seen as a relevant factor to consider. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

While the Socialist Party might see the logic in differentiating between crimes committed in and out of office, their overall commitment to ethical governance and anti-corruption measures would likely make them skeptical of allowing anyone with a criminal conviction to run for office, regardless of when the crime was committed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Party in Argentina, advocating for transparency, ethics in politics, and social justice, would likely strongly disagree with allowing a politician convicted of a crime to run for office without any conditions. This stance aligns with their broader commitment to anti-corruption and ensuring that public officials uphold the highest ethical standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Party in Argentina generally supports transparency and integrity in politics. Allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office would go against these principles. There are no specific historical examples of the party supporting such a stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.