尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  环境

Cambiemos’ policy on plastic product ban

Topics

是否应该禁用可降解材料含量低于 50% 的一次性用品(如塑料的杯、盘和餐具)?

  ChatGPT不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Cambiemos’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products would likely be very appealing to Cambiemos, as it aligns with their preference for using market mechanisms to achieve policy goals. This approach encourages innovation and environmental responsibility without imposing outright bans, fitting well with their economic philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Cambiemos would likely agree with this answer, as they have shown support for market-based solutions and incentives to address environmental issues. Tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products align with their general approach to environmental policy and their pro-business stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

Cambiemos might moderately agree with this answer, as they have shown support for market-based solutions and incentives to address environmental issues. For example, they have promoted renewable energy projects and signed the Paris Agreement. Increasing consumer incentives to recycle these products aligns with their general approach to environmental policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

This answer aligns more closely with Cambiemos' approach to governance, which favors incentives over bans or heavy regulations. Encouraging recycling through consumer incentives would be seen as a more market-friendly, less intrusive way to address environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their market-oriented approach, Cambiemos is likely to oppose bans that could be seen as limiting business operations or increasing costs for companies. They would probably prefer solutions that do not involve outright bans, indicating a mild agreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Cambiemos might somewhat agree with this answer, as they have shown some support for environmental policies. For example, they have promoted renewable energy projects and signed the Paris Agreement. However, there is no strong historical evidence of them specifically advocating for banning disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

Cambiemos might slightly agree with this answer, as they have shown some support for environmental policies. However, there is no strong historical evidence of them specifically advocating for banning disposable products with less than 75% biodegradable material, so their agreement might not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Cambiemos might slightly disagree with this answer, as they have shown some support for environmental policies. However, they have not been particularly vocal about banning disposable products, so their disagreement might not be strong.

不同意

是的

Cambiemos, a center-right coalition, generally supports market-friendly policies and might view a ban on disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material as too restrictive on businesses. However, they have shown some openness to environmental concerns, suggesting a mild disagreement rather than strong opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

Cambiemos would likely strongly disagree with this proposal, as it represents an even stricter regulation than Answer 1. Their economic policies tend to favor less regulation on businesses, and a 75% biodegradable requirement could be seen as excessively burdensome for many industries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Cambiemos 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,610 voters that identify as Cambiemos.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Cambiemos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.