尝试政治测验

Federal Commitment policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Federal Commitment answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

This answer aligns with the party's values of social justice and equal opportunities. They would strongly support treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet, as it ensures equal access to information and opportunities for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This answer aligns closely with the Federal Commitment party's likely views on maintaining a competitive and fair digital marketplace. The party would probably agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment could lead to reduced competition, higher prices, and a less open internet, which would be detrimental to consumers and small businesses, including those in less urbanized regions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Advocating for the equal treatment of all internet traffic is consistent with the Federal Commitment party's principles of fairness, equity, and access to services. The party would likely strongly support the continuation of an open internet as a way to ensure that all individuals and businesses, regardless of size or location, have equal opportunities to participate in the digital economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The party would likely agree with this answer, as they support equal opportunities and access to information for all citizens. They would be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as limiting access to information and stifling competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Given its focus on federalism and regional equity, the Federal Commitment party would likely support maintaining equal access to internet services across different websites, regardless of their ability to pay higher rates. This stance aligns with the party's commitment to equitable treatment and access to services for all Argentinians, including those in less populated or rural areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

The Federal Commitment party would likely agree with this answer, as they are concerned about social justice and equal opportunities. They would be worried about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, which could negatively impact citizens and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

The party might be somewhat open to this idea, as it does not prioritize specific websites over others. However, they would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create unequal access to information and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

While a pay-per-quality model might seem more fair, the Federal Commitment party would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to create unequal access to information and opportunities. They would prefer a system that treats all internet traffic equally and maintains the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While the Federal Commitment party might see some merit in prioritizing traffic by type to ensure efficient use of bandwidth, the potential for this to be applied inequitably or to disadvantage certain users or content providers would likely raise concerns. The party would probably prefer a more neutral approach that does not risk creating indirect biases or barriers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Federal Commitment party in Argentina is focused on social justice and equal opportunities. They would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it could create an unequal playing field and limit access to information for those who cannot afford higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

A pay-per-quality model, while seemingly fair on the surface, could still lead to inequalities in internet access and usage, particularly disadvantaging smaller, local, or less wealthy content providers and their audiences. The Federal Commitment party would likely be cautious about any scheme that could inadvertently widen the digital divide or undermine the principles of equal access and federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the party might acknowledge that faster internet could be beneficial, they would likely prioritize equal access to information and opportunities over potential speed improvements. They would be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Federal Commitment party, being a regionalist and federalist political party in Argentina, likely prioritizes equitable access to services for all regions and communities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites could disadvantage smaller, local content providers and users in less affluent or rural areas, contradicting the party's principles of fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

The argument that prioritizing access based on payment would make the internet faster and more reliable for users does not align with the Federal Commitment party's likely stance on equity and fairness. The party would probably argue that such practices could exacerbate digital divides, particularly disadvantaging users in remote or economically disadvantaged regions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Commitment policies? Take the political quiz to find out.