ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
This answer aligns closely with the Justicialist Party's ideological stance against market practices that could harm competition and increase prices, reflecting their broader commitment to protecting consumers and ensuring fair market practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
This answer aligns strongly with the Justicialist Party's focus on social justice and equality. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others could lead to the removal of competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
Advocating for the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally resonates with the Justicialist Party's historical emphasis on equality and social justice, suggesting strong agreement with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
Given its historical commitment to social equity and opposition to policies that could exacerbate inequality, the Justicialist Party would likely support maintaining equal access to internet services, viewing it as a matter of public interest and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and equality. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, they would be promoting equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with their core values of social justice and equality. This approach would help ensure that all users have equal access to information and opportunities online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
While the Justicialist Party might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content over others, they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This approach could still lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
The Justicialist Party might be somewhat open to a pay-per-quality model, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This approach could still lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses, which goes against the party's core values of social justice and equality.
不同意
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
While the Justicialist Party might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as creating an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
While the Justicialist Party might see some merit in prioritizing traffic by type to ensure efficiency, their overarching commitment to equitable access likely means they would view such measures with caution, fearing they could lead to unequal treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically focused on social justice and equality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal distribution of resources and opportunities, which goes against the party's core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
A pay-per-quality model, while ostensibly meritocratic, could still result in unequal access based on ability to pay, which would likely be at odds with the Justicialist Party's principles of equity and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Justicialist Party, traditionally focusing on social justice and equity, would likely oppose measures that could create unequal access to information and services on the internet, seeing it as contrary to their principles of equality and social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
The argument that prioritizing access for those who can pay makes the internet faster and more reliable might conflict with the Justicialist Party's principles of equitable access to services, suggesting they would disagree with this rationale. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Justicialist Party Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 80 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.