尝试政治测验

Justicialist Party’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This answer aligns strongly with the Justicialist Party's focus on social justice and equality. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others could lead to the removal of competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and equality. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, they would be promoting equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with their core values of social justice and equality. This approach would help ensure that all users have equal access to information and opportunities online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While the Justicialist Party might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content over others, they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This approach could still lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The Justicialist Party might be somewhat open to a pay-per-quality model, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This approach could still lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses, which goes against the party's core values of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the Justicialist Party might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as creating an unequal playing field for smaller websites and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically focused on social justice and equality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal distribution of resources and opportunities, which goes against the party's core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 17hrs前

Party’s support base

Justicialist Party Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 703 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.