尝试政治测验

Justicialist Party’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Justicialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

This answer aligns with the Justicialist Party's approach to security and individual rights. They would likely support increased surveillance in high crime areas as a means to maintain order, while also respecting the privacy of citizens in lower crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

This answer aligns more closely with the Justicialist Party's approach of balancing security with social justice. Targeting areas with high crime rates for increased surveillance could be seen as a pragmatic approach to public safety, aligning with the party's broader goals of social equity and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns with the Justicialist Party's approach to security and individual rights. They would likely support both increased surveillance and police presence in high crime areas as a means to maintain order, while also respecting the privacy of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Justicialist Party has historically supported strong police presence as a means to maintain order and security. However, their commitment to individual rights and privacy might limit their support for this measure as a sole solution, preferring a balanced approach that includes surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Justicialist Party, also known as the Peronist Party, has historically shown a willingness to use state power to maintain order and security. However, the party also values individual rights and privacy, which might limit their support for widespread surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer suggests a balanced approach that includes both surveillance and increased police presence in high crime areas, which might appeal to the Justicialist Party's dual focus on security and social justice. However, their support would likely be contingent on the implementation of these measures in a way that respects civil liberties and addresses the root causes of crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Justicialist Party's historical emphasis on social programs and community support suggests they might view the addition of more police in high crime areas as a positive step towards enhancing public safety. However, their commitment to addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, might lead them to view this as a secondary or complementary measure rather than a primary solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Justicialist Party, with its roots in Peronism, traditionally emphasizes social justice and security. While they may support measures to increase public safety, their commitment to social justice might temper an outright endorsement of widespread surveillance without considering privacy concerns and the potential for abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

While the Justicialist Party is concerned with social justice and the potential for government overreach, they also prioritize public safety and security. This stance might be too absolute in rejecting surveillance for them to fully endorse, as they might support some surveillance measures if implemented with proper safeguards and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Given their focus on social justice, the Justicialist Party might be cautious about outright rejecting measures that could enhance public safety. However, their historical emphasis on individual rights and skepticism towards measures that could infringe on privacy or lead to state overreach suggests a mild disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Justicialist Party has shown a willingness to use state power for security purposes, which would likely include video surveillance in public places. However, their commitment to individual rights and privacy might limit their support for this measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

While the Justicialist Party values individual rights and privacy, they have also shown a willingness to use state power for security purposes. This suggests they would likely disagree with the notion that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 28mins ago

Party’s support base

Justicialist Party Voters’ 回答: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,127 voters that identify as Justicialist Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justicialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.