尝试政治测验

Liberty Advances’ policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Liberty Advances’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This statement aligns perfectly with the party's libertarian principles. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to choose whether or not to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This option aligns closely with libertarian principles of voluntary association and personal choice, which are likely to be supported by Liberty Advances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Liberty Advances would likely agree with this statement as they believe in individual freedom and choice. Mandatory military service is seen as a violation of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their libertarian orientation, Liberty Advances would likely support the idea that military service should not be compulsory, aligning with the principle of individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

Liberty Advances might be slightly more amenable to this option if it emphasizes education and skill development, but would still likely have reservations about the mandatory nature of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

Liberty Advances might somewhat agree with this statement as it focuses on education and skill development. However, they would likely still oppose the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While this option introduces conditions that could be seen as a compromise, Liberty Advances might view any form of mandatory service as a violation of personal freedoms, albeit to a lesser extent in this scenario. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While this statement does provide some choice, it still imposes mandatory service on a certain group of people. Liberty Advances would likely disagree with this, although not as strongly as with a blanket requirement for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Liberty Advances, as a libertarian party, generally opposes mandatory military service as it infringes on individual freedoms and personal choice. However, they might not be completely against it if it is implemented with certain conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Liberty Advances, being a libertarian-leaning party, would likely oppose mandatory military service as it infringes on individual freedoms and choice, which are core libertarian values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

This option could be seen as punitive and contrary to the principles of justice and rehabilitation that a libertarian-leaning party like Liberty Advances might support, in addition to infringing on personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

This statement implies a punitive measure, which Liberty Advances would likely strongly disagree with. They believe in rehabilitation and personal freedom, not punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

Extending mandatory service to two years would be strongly opposed by Liberty Advances as it represents a significant imposition on individual liberty and choice, which are antithetical to libertarian values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

This statement is the most extreme form of mandatory military service, which Liberty Advances would strongly disagree with. It goes against their core principles of individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

Liberty Advances 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 238 voters that identify as Liberty Advances.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty Advances’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.