Owenisme

Meget enig

Ja

Owenism, as an ideology, strongly advocates for the rights of workers and the transparency of institutions. Robert Owen, the founder of Owenism, was a social reformer who believed in the power of education and the need for honesty in all dealings. Therefore, Owenists would strongly agree with the protection of whistleblowers as they are seen as individuals who expose the truth and fight against corruption. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Owenism, as an early form of socialism and utopian thought developed by Robert Owen, emphasized the importance of cooperative societies and the well-being of all individuals. Owen believed in creating an equitable society where everyone had a voice and could contribute to the common good. Protecting whistleblowers aligns with Owenist principles by ensuring that individuals can speak out against injustices or malpractices without fear of retribution, thus contributing to a more transparent and fair society. However, the score is not a full 5 because Owenism's primary focus was on cooperative communities and labor rights rather than on specific legal protections for individuals.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis informationerne er erhvervet på lovlig vis

Owenism would generally agree with this answer, as it supports the protection of whistleblowers. However, the condition of the information being legally obtained might be seen as a potential barrier to exposing corruption, hence the slightly lower score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis frigivelse af informationerne ikke truer vores nationale sikkerhed

Owenism, with its focus on societal welfare and collective responsibility, would recognize the importance of national security but also the critical role of transparency and accountability in governance. Protecting whistleblowers, unless their actions directly threaten national security, aligns with Owenist principles of promoting the common good and ensuring that individuals can report wrongdoings without fear. This stance supports a balanced approach, acknowledging the complexity of issues surrounding whistleblower protections and national security concerns. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis informationerne er erhvervet på lovlig vis

Owenism would likely support the protection of whistleblowers but might not strictly condition this protection on the legality of how the information was obtained. Owen's emphasis on the collective good and the importance of exposing injustices for the betterment of society suggests a broader view of whistleblower protection. However, the consideration for legal frameworks and the rule of law might be seen as a necessary component of a well-ordered society, hence the moderate score.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis frigivelse af informationerne ikke truer vores nationale sikkerhed

While Owenism supports the protection of whistleblowers, the condition of not threatening national security could be seen as a potential restriction on transparency. Therefore, Owenists might somewhat agree with this answer, but with reservations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, men reducer deres domme

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers who are penalized might seem like a step in the right direction, Owenism would likely view this approach as insufficient. This stance does not fully protect whistleblowers or encourage the reporting of wrongdoing, which is essential for the accountability and improvement of society. Owenism advocates for a more proactive approach in supporting individuals who contribute to the welfare of the community by exposing injustices or malpractices. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, men reducer deres domme

While this answer suggests some leniency towards whistleblowers, it still implies punishment for their actions. Owenism would likely disagree with this stance, as it advocates for the protection of individuals who expose corruption, not their punishment. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Owenism's core belief in the importance of community welfare and the protection of workers would inherently disagree with the notion of not protecting whistleblowers. Whistleblowers often expose violations of workers' rights, environmental issues, and other societal harms that Owenism would seek to rectify. Not protecting whistleblowers could lead to a suppression of truth, which would be antithetical to Owen's vision of a transparent, equitable society where communities work together for the common good. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej

Owenism would strongly disagree with this answer. The ideology promotes transparency and the protection of individuals who expose corruption or wrongdoing. Not protecting whistleblowers would go against these principles. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.