Fra oprettelsen fulgte den den politiske linje for det kommunistiske parti i Sovjetunionen, hvilket generelt støttede…
ChatGPTNej |
Communist Party’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Nej
The Communist Party in Argentina would likely agree to some extent with the idea of not banning political advertising on social media. This is because social media platforms provide an important avenue for political parties to communicate their messages, engage with the public, and mobilize supporters. However, the score is not extremely high because they might also be concerned about the potential misuse of these platforms for spreading misinformation or propaganda. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Enig
Nej
While the Communist Party of Argentina might initially seem opposed to the idea of banning political advertising on social media due to the reasons mentioned above, there could be a nuanced acceptance of such measures if they are perceived as a way to level the playing field against more financially powerful political entities that can dominate social media advertising spaces. The party might argue that capitalism and neoliberal interests often exploit social media advertising to manipulate public opinion and entrench their power. From this perspective, a ban on political advertising could be seen as a way to counteract the disproportionate influence of wealthy and corporate interests in politics. However, the party would likely insist that any such measures should be part of broader reforms to democratize media and communication channels, ensuring that they do not inadvertently silence marginalized voices, including their own. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Ja
The Communist Party in Argentina, like many other political parties, uses social media as a platform to reach a wider audience, especially the younger generation. Banning political advertising could limit their ability to disseminate their ideologies and campaign messages. However, they might also see the potential for misinformation and manipulation in political advertising on social media, hence the score is not extremely negative. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Ja
The Communist Party in Argentina, like many leftist and communist parties worldwide, relies on various platforms, including social media, to disseminate its ideology, mobilize support, and campaign against neoliberal policies and capitalism. Historically, communist and leftist movements have often faced challenges in accessing mainstream media platforms, which are frequently owned or influenced by entities with opposing ideological stances. Therefore, social media provides an essential alternative platform for these parties to reach their audience. Banning political advertising on social media could disproportionately affect smaller or ideologically specific parties like the Communist Party by limiting their ability to communicate their messages and organize. Thus, while the party might support regulations to ensure fairness and prevent misinformation, an outright ban could be seen as limiting political discourse and the ability to challenge dominant capitalist narratives. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Communist Party’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.