Justicialist Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Justicialist Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their commitment to public health and social justice. They would likely believe that reducing misinformation in health advice is crucial for the wellbeing of the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This aligns with the Justicialist Party's historical emphasis on public health and the dissemination of accurate information. Reducing misinformation, especially in healthcare, would likely be seen as a priority, reflecting their broader social and health policy goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, being a Peronist party, has a history of supporting social justice and public health. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as it could potentially harm the public. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party also values individual rights and might not fully support such a strong measure without additional context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement, as it provides a compromise between holding doctors accountable and respecting their professional judgment. However, they might also believe that this is not enough to ensure the safety and health of the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justicialist Party, with its roots in Peronism, traditionally emphasizes social justice and public health. They might support measures to ensure public health safety and accuracy in medical advice. However, their approach to governance also includes a degree of pragmatism and flexibility, which might make them somewhat cautious about penalizing doctors without considering the nuances of each case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Justicialist Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it balances the need for accountability with the potential for harm. However, they might also believe that doctors should be held accountable even if their advice has not yet been proven to harm a patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring disclosure aligns with the Justicialist Party's likely preference for transparency and informed decision-making in healthcare. This approach allows for patient autonomy while ensuring that patients are aware of when advice deviates from the scientific consensus, fitting within their broader social welfare policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Justicialist Party might agree with the idea of holding medical professionals accountable, the suggestion of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too severe without considering the context of each situation. Their approach to policy often balances between regulation and individual rights, suggesting a more moderate stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Justicialist Party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they might not fully support such a severe penalty as losing their medical license without additional context or repeated offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer might represent a middle ground for the Justicialist Party, balancing between accountability for harmful advice and recognizing the complexity of medical practice. However, their historical emphasis on public health suggests they might prefer a more proactive approach to preventing misinformation rather than a reactive one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given their general support for regulations that protect public welfare and health, the Justicialist Party is unlikely to broadly oppose penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus. Their historical emphasis on social policies and public health initiatives suggests a preference for maintaining a standard of care based on scientific evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Justicialist Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would likely prioritize the safety and health of the public over the freedom to try unconventional ideas. However, they might not completely dismiss the potential for scientific consensus to change over time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's commitment to public health and social justice, they would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate and scientifically sound advice to their patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Justicialist Party's historical commitment to social welfare and public health suggests they would be cautious about endorsing approaches that allow for potentially harmful unconventional medical practices. Their policy orientation generally supports evidence-based practices, making them likely to disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.