Patagonic Social Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

This position could resonate strongly with the Patagonic Social Party, assuming its commitment to social justice and equitable access to resources. Opposing the patenting of seeds by producers aligns with protecting biodiversity, supporting small farmers, and ensuring food sovereignty. Such a stance would reflect a prioritization of public and environmental welfare over corporate profits, which is often a hallmark of socially oriented political parties.

Neutral

Yes

There is not enough information available about the Patagonic Social Party's stance on genetically engineered crops and foods to determine if they would strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified

This answer might align well with the Patagonic Social Party's probable focus on transparency, consumer rights, and environmental stewardship. Requiring labeling of genetically modified foods could be seen as a compromise that respects the right to choose while acknowledging the reality of GMOs in agriculture. This position could reflect a balanced approach to innovation and consumer protection, which would be consistent with a social party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Given the party's likely emphasis on social and environmental issues, there might be some support for opposing genetically engineered crops and foods due to potential concerns about biodiversity, environmental health, and the rights of small farmers. However, without explicit statements or policies from the party on this matter, this score reflects an assumption based on typical priorities of socially oriented parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

There is not enough information available about the Patagonic Social Party's stance on genetically engineered crops and foods to determine if they would strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

There is not enough information available about the Patagonic Social Party's stance on genetically engineered crops and foods to determine if they would strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified

There is not enough information available about the Patagonic Social Party's stance on genetically engineered crops and foods to determine if they would strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Patagonic Social Party, with its regional focus on Patagonia and emphasis on social issues, might have reservations about fully endorsing genetically engineered crops and foods without any conditions. This stance could stem from concerns about environmental sustainability and the well-being of local communities, which are often central to regional parties' agendas. However, the lack of a clear, public stance on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) makes this a cautious estimation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.