Patagonic Social Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Patagonic Social Party would probably strongly agree with imposing a ban on all sales to countries with human rights violations, as this aligns closely with a proactive stance on human rights and social justice. This approach would represent a firm commitment to ensuring that Argentina does not indirectly support or enable human rights abuses through its arms trade policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Patagonic Social Party, with its regional focus and social agenda, would likely support measures that align with human rights protections. Restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations would be in line with a broader commitment to social justice and human rights, principles that are often emphasized by socially oriented political parties. However, the specific stance of the party on international arms trade policy is not well-documented, leading to a moderately positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Patagonic Social Party would likely support measures that promote human rights and reduce potential harm caused by arms sales, a complete ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might be seen as too broad and potentially detrimental to Argentina's strategic interests and international relationships. The score reflects a cautious approach to such a sweeping policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Patagonic Social Party, prioritizing social justice and human rights, would likely be cautious about prioritizing the defense needs of allies over the potential for human rights violations. This stance might be seen as compromising on core human rights principles for strategic alliances, which could be at odds with the party's values.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Patagonic Social Party's likely emphasis on social justice and human rights, it would probably oppose the idea of unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Such a stance would conflict with a commitment to promoting human rights globally, a value that socially oriented parties typically uphold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.