尝试政治测验

E-Democracy policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

ED>ED  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

E-Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

E-Democracy agrees with this statement because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

E-Democracy strongly supports equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones ensures a level playing field and promotes the diversity of content available to users. This aligns with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

E-Democracy strongly supports treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach ensures equal access to information and opportunities for all users, which aligns with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

E-Democracy might be more open to this approach as it prioritizes content types rather than specific websites. However, it still has the potential to create an unequal playing field for websites and limit the diversity of content available to users. This approach does not fully align with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

A pay-per-quality model might be more acceptable to E-Democracy as it could promote better quality content. However, it still has the potential to create an unequal playing field for websites, especially for smaller websites that may not be able to afford higher rates. This approach does not fully align with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While E-Democracy may appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, it would not support this at the expense of creating an unequal playing field for websites. This approach could limit the diversity of content available to users and goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

E-Democracy values equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and potentially limit the diversity of content available to users. This goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to E-Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.