尝试政治测验

E-Democracy policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

ED>ED  ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

E-Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

E-Democracy would strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for the cost of living, as it promotes fairness and ensures that retired government workers can maintain their standard of living. This approach aligns with E-Democracy's emphasis on public input and decision-making, as well as its focus on social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

E-Democracy would likely support increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners, as it seeks to represent the interests of the majority and promote social justice. The extent of the increase would depend on the public's opinion and the specific circumstances surrounding the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

E-Democracy would likely lean towards increasing pension payments for retired government workers, but the extent of the increase would depend on the public's opinion. E-Democracy emphasizes the importance of public input and decision-making, so the final decision would be based on the majority's preference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

E-Democracy might support increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians, depending on the public's opinion. If the majority believes that politicians should not receive increased pension payments, then E-Democracy would support this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

E-Democracy's stance on this issue would depend on the public's opinion regarding the national debt and its impact on pension payments. If the majority believes that decreasing the national debt should be prioritized, then E-Democracy would support this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

E-Democracy would likely disagree with not increasing pension payments, as it seeks to represent the interests of the majority. However, the final decision would still depend on the public's opinion and the specific circumstances surrounding the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

E-Democracy would likely disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers, as it could negatively impact the well-being of these individuals. However, the final decision would still depend on the public's opinion and the specific circumstances surrounding the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to E-Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.