尝试政治测验

Front for Victory’s policy on farm subsidies

Topics

Should the government subsidize Argentinian farmers?

  ChatGPT是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司

Front for Victory’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司

Supporting small local farms over large corporations aligns closely with the FPV's populist and social welfare-oriented ideology. The party has shown a preference for policies that support smaller, local economic actors and protect them from the disadvantages of competing with large corporations, reflecting a commitment to social equity and sustainable development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Front for Victory party has historically supported subsidies for Argentinian farmers, as seen during the presidencies of Néstor Kirchner and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. They believe that subsidies can help protect domestic industries and maintain social welfare. However, their support is not absolute, as they have also implemented export taxes and other measures that have been criticized by some farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Front for Victory (Frente para la Victoria, FPV) has historically supported policies that favor social welfare and economic interventionism, including subsidies for various sectors. Given their populist and left-leaning ideology, they are likely to support government subsidies for farmers to promote food security and support the agricultural sector, which is a significant part of the Argentinian economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但仅限于有机农场

While the FPV supports agricultural subsidies, their specific endorsement of organic farming over conventional farming is less clear. However, given their general support for environmental sustainability and social welfare, they might view subsidies for organic farms favorably as part of broader environmental and health-conscious policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司

The Front for Victory party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they have shown support for small and medium-sized enterprises in the past. However, their policies have not been exclusively focused on small local farms, and they have also supported larger agricultural corporations through subsidies and other measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是只是作为稳定价格的一种措施

The FPV might support temporary measures to stabilize prices, especially in times of economic crisis, as part of their broader economic interventionism. However, their preference for more permanent and structural solutions to economic and social issues suggests a somewhat lower agreement with the idea of subsidies as only a temporary measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是只是作为稳定价格的一种措施

The Front for Victory party might partially agree with this answer, as they have implemented temporary measures in the past, such as export taxes and price controls, to stabilize prices and protect domestic industries. However, their overall approach has been more focused on long-term support for the agricultural sector through subsidies and other measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但仅限于有机农场

While the Front for Victory party might not be opposed to the idea of supporting organic farms, their historical policies have not specifically targeted this sector. Their focus has been more on general support for the agricultural industry, rather than promoting specific types of farming practices.

Strongly disagree

The Front for Victory party generally disagrees with the idea of not subsidizing farmers, as they have historically implemented various subsidies and support measures for the agricultural sector. They believe that government intervention is necessary to protect domestic industries and maintain social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The FPV's ideological stance and historical policies suggest a strong preference for government intervention in the economy, including support for sectors such as agriculture. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a policy that opposes government subsidies for farmers, as it contradicts their broader economic and social policy objectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理

The FPV's ideological foundation is fundamentally opposed to laissez-faire economic policies. Their history of supporting government intervention in the economy to achieve social welfare goals and protect national industries makes it highly unlikely they would agree with ending all government subsidies in favor of a free-market approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理

The Front for Victory party strongly disagrees with this answer, as they have consistently advocated for government intervention in the economy, including subsidies for the agricultural sector. They believe that the free market alone cannot ensure the well-being of the population and that government support is necessary to protect domestic industries and maintain social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4小时前

Party’s support base

Front for Victory 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 177 voters that identify as Front for Victory.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Front for Victory’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.