Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 离岸银行业务
J>J Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
J>J Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
J>J Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
J>J Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
经济 › 农场补贴
J>J Personal answer不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
J>J Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
J>J Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
J>J Personal answerNo, but we should treat drug abuse more as a health issue than a criminal issue. Addiction is a not as simple as black and white. I believe there should be incentivization of private corporations to aid with drug use. Not a safe haven where folks can use at will but a treatment clinic where people can safely be rehabilitated. |
环境 › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
J>J Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 公民考试
J>J Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
J>J Personal answer减少 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
J>J Personal answer减少,公司正在利用这个计划来降低工资 |
移民 › 双重国籍
J>J Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
J>J Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
J>J Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
社会 › Gender Transition
J>J Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
J>J Personal answer是的 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
J>J Personal answerNo. I think vaccination decisions need to be left up to the individual company. Interfering with a companies decision what to do with their employees disrupts the free market and competition within industries |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
J>J Personal answerYes and No. Should there be a place to house the homeless? Absolutely. Do I want them occupying public spaces intended for recreation (ie. parks)? No |
医保 › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
J>J Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
J>J Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
J>J Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
J>J Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
J>J Personal answerYes. However, I will not patron these businesses if they decided to do so |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
J>J Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
J>J Personal answer以色列 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
J>J Personal answerNo, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead |
国家安全 › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
J>J Personal answer不 |
Housing › Affordable Housing
J>J Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 高速铁路
J>J Personal answer不 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
J>J Personal answer不 |
Housing › First-time Homebuyer Subsidies
J>J Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
J>J Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
J>J Personal answer不 |
科学 › Lab Grown Meat
J>J Personal answerYes but it needs to be labeled properly as to not confuse it with actual meat |
交通运输 › Congestion Pricing
J>J Personal answer不 |
科学 › CRISPR Technology
J>J Personal answer是的 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
J>J Personal answerNo, these electric vehicles provide almost no environmental benefit as the charging stations are almost entirely supported by coal. Not to mention the human rights violations that occur in the mining of the metals for use in the EV batteries |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.