Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › VAT Rates
9>9 Personal answerDecrease, but only on food and medicine |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › 经济刺激
9>9 Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answer降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞 |
医保 › 避孕
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
9>9 Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount |
总统大选 › Elected Representatives
9>9 Personal answerNo, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
9>9 Personal answer不,成员国之间的贸易已经非常不均衡了 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
9>9 Personal answerSi, pero la cultura historica económica no tiene el enfoque que se le debería dar |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
经济 › 农场补贴
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是只是作为稳定价格的一种措施 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
9>9 Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
外交政策 › 外国选举
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for cryptocurrencies that hold stable value without price fluctuation |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.